Message ID | ZahG7xgHJ4Tf8mHI@shikoro |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [PULL,REQUEST] i2c-for-6.8-rc1-fixed | expand |
On Wed, 17 Jan 2024 at 13:30, Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org> wrote: > > And a big series for the > designware-driver needed to be reverted because issues have been > reported late in the cycle and no incremental fix has been found yet. > This is the fixed pull requested with a missing revert added. Honestly, with three quarters of the commits being the broken series, followed by reverting it, I get the feeling that this would be better rebased. I don't like rebasing, but I also don't like "look, we had most of these commits broken, so we just reverted them all" all noticed before it even hits my tree. So I really feel like at that point you go "this branch was a failure" and start anew - aka rebase. Along with a big explanation of why a recent rebase ended up happening, so that there is no confusion about it. Linus