diff mbox series

[v2,4/4] Bluetooth: Remove pending ACL connection attempts

Message ID 20240108183938.468426-5-verdre@v0yd.nl
State Superseded
Headers show
Series Bluetooth: Improve retrying of connection attempts | expand

Commit Message

Jonas Dreßler Jan. 8, 2024, 6:39 p.m. UTC
With the last commit we moved to using the hci_sync queue for "Create
Connection" requests, removing the need for retrying the paging after
finished/failed "Create Connection" requests and after the end of
inquiries.

hci_conn_check_pending() was used to trigger this retry, we can remove it
now.

Note that we can also remove the special handling for COMMAND_DISALLOWED
errors in the completion handler of "Create Connection", because "Create
Connection" requests are now always serialized.

This is somewhat reverting commit 4c67bc74f016 ("[Bluetooth] Support
concurrent connect requests").

With this, the BT_CONNECT2 state of ACL hci_conn objects should now be
back to meaning only one thing: That we received a connection request
from another device (see hci_conn_request_evt), but the actual connect
should be deferred.
---
 include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h |  1 -
 net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c         | 16 ----------------
 net/bluetooth/hci_event.c        | 21 ++++-----------------
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

Comments

Jonas Dreßler Jan. 8, 2024, 6:44 p.m. UTC | #1
On 1/8/24 19:39, Jonas Dreßler wrote:
> With the last commit we moved to using the hci_sync queue for "Create
> Connection" requests, removing the need for retrying the paging after
> finished/failed "Create Connection" requests and after the end of
> inquiries.
> 
> hci_conn_check_pending() was used to trigger this retry, we can remove it
> now.
> 
> Note that we can also remove the special handling for COMMAND_DISALLOWED
> errors in the completion handler of "Create Connection", because "Create
> Connection" requests are now always serialized.
> 
> This is somewhat reverting commit 4c67bc74f016 ("[Bluetooth] Support
> concurrent connect requests").
> 
> With this, the BT_CONNECT2 state of ACL hci_conn objects should now be
> back to meaning only one thing: That we received a connection request
> from another device (see hci_conn_request_evt), but the actual connect
> should be deferred.
> ---
>   include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h |  1 -
>   net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c         | 16 ----------------
>   net/bluetooth/hci_event.c        | 21 ++++-----------------
>   3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> index 2c30834c1..d7483958d 100644
> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> @@ -1330,7 +1330,6 @@ struct hci_conn *hci_conn_add(struct hci_dev *hdev, int type, bdaddr_t *dst,
>   			      u8 role);
>   void hci_conn_del(struct hci_conn *conn);
>   void hci_conn_hash_flush(struct hci_dev *hdev);
> -void hci_conn_check_pending(struct hci_dev *hdev);
>   
>   struct hci_chan *hci_chan_create(struct hci_conn *conn);
>   void hci_chan_del(struct hci_chan *chan);
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
> index 541d55301..22033057b 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
> @@ -2534,22 +2534,6 @@ void hci_conn_hash_flush(struct hci_dev *hdev)
>   	}
>   }
>   
> -/* Check pending connect attempts */
> -void hci_conn_check_pending(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> -{
> -	struct hci_conn *conn;
> -
> -	BT_DBG("hdev %s", hdev->name);
> -
> -	hci_dev_lock(hdev);
> -
> -	conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_state(hdev, ACL_LINK, BT_CONNECT2);
> -	if (conn)
> -		hci_cmd_sync_queue(hdev, hci_acl_create_connection_sync, conn, NULL);
> -
> -	hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
> -}
> -
>   static u32 get_link_mode(struct hci_conn *conn)
>   {
>   	u32 link_mode = 0;
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> index e8b4a0126..91973d6d1 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> @@ -117,8 +117,6 @@ static u8 hci_cc_inquiry_cancel(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data,
>   		hci_discovery_set_state(hdev, DISCOVERY_STOPPED);
>   	hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
>   
> -	hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
> -
>   	return rp->status;
>   }
>   
> @@ -149,8 +147,6 @@ static u8 hci_cc_exit_periodic_inq(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data,
>   
>   	hci_dev_clear_flag(hdev, HCI_PERIODIC_INQ);
>   
> -	hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
> -
>   	return rp->status;
>   }
>   
> @@ -2296,10 +2292,8 @@ static void hci_cs_inquiry(struct hci_dev *hdev, __u8 status)
>   {
>   	bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "status 0x%2.2x", status);
>   
> -	if (status) {
> -		hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
> +	if (status)
>   		return;
> -	}
>   
>   	set_bit(HCI_INQUIRY, &hdev->flags);
>   }
> @@ -2323,12 +2317,9 @@ static void hci_cs_create_conn(struct hci_dev *hdev, __u8 status)
>   
>   	if (status) {
>   		if (conn && conn->state == BT_CONNECT) {
> -			if (status != HCI_ERROR_COMMAND_DISALLOWED || conn->attempt > 2) {
> -				conn->state = BT_CLOSED;
> -				hci_connect_cfm(conn, status);
> -				hci_conn_del(conn);
> -			} else
> -				conn->state = BT_CONNECT2;
> +			conn->state = BT_CLOSED;
> +			hci_connect_cfm(conn, status);
> +			hci_conn_del(conn);
>   		}
>   	} else {
>   		if (!conn) {
> @@ -3020,8 +3011,6 @@ static void hci_inquiry_complete_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data,
>   
>   	bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "status 0x%2.2x", ev->status);
>   
> -	hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
> -
>   	if (!test_and_clear_bit(HCI_INQUIRY, &hdev->flags))
>   		return;
>   
> @@ -3247,8 +3236,6 @@ static void hci_conn_complete_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data,
>   
>   unlock:
>   	hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
> -
> -	hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
>   }
>   
>   static void hci_reject_conn(struct hci_dev *hdev, bdaddr_t *bdaddr)

Please take a special look at this one: I'm not sure if I'm breaking the 
functionality of deferred connecting using BT_CONNECT2 in 
hci_conn_request_evt() here, as I don't see anywhere where we check for 
this state and establish a connection later.

It seems that this is how hci_conn_request_evt() was initially written 
though, hci_conn_check_pending() only got introduced later and seems 
unrelated.

Thanks,
Jonas
Luiz Augusto von Dentz Jan. 8, 2024, 7:41 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Jonas,

On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 2:29 PM Jonas Dreßler <verdre@v0yd.nl> wrote:
>
> Hi Luiz,
>
> On 1/8/24 20:14, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> > Hi Jonas,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 1:55 PM Jonas Dreßler <verdre@v0yd.nl> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 1/8/24 19:44, Jonas Dreßler wrote:
> >>> On 1/8/24 19:39, Jonas Dreßler wrote:
> >>>> With the last commit we moved to using the hci_sync queue for "Create
> >>>> Connection" requests, removing the need for retrying the paging after
> >>>> finished/failed "Create Connection" requests and after the end of
> >>>> inquiries.
> >>>>
> >>>> hci_conn_check_pending() was used to trigger this retry, we can remove it
> >>>> now.
> >>>>
> >>>> Note that we can also remove the special handling for COMMAND_DISALLOWED
> >>>> errors in the completion handler of "Create Connection", because "Create
> >>>> Connection" requests are now always serialized.
> >>>>
> >>>> This is somewhat reverting commit 4c67bc74f016 ("[Bluetooth] Support
> >>>> concurrent connect requests").
> >>>>
> >>>> With this, the BT_CONNECT2 state of ACL hci_conn objects should now be
> >>>> back to meaning only one thing: That we received a connection request
> >>>> from another device (see hci_conn_request_evt), but the actual connect
> >>>> should be deferred.
> >>>> ---
> >>>>    include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h |  1 -
> >>>>    net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c         | 16 ----------------
> >>>>    net/bluetooth/hci_event.c        | 21 ++++-----------------
> >>>>    3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> >>>> b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> >>>> index 2c30834c1..d7483958d 100644
> >>>> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> >>>> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> >>>> @@ -1330,7 +1330,6 @@ struct hci_conn *hci_conn_add(struct hci_dev
> >>>> *hdev, int type, bdaddr_t *dst,
> >>>>                      u8 role);
> >>>>    void hci_conn_del(struct hci_conn *conn);
> >>>>    void hci_conn_hash_flush(struct hci_dev *hdev);
> >>>> -void hci_conn_check_pending(struct hci_dev *hdev);
> >>>>    struct hci_chan *hci_chan_create(struct hci_conn *conn);
> >>>>    void hci_chan_del(struct hci_chan *chan);
> >>>> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
> >>>> index 541d55301..22033057b 100644
> >>>> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
> >>>> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
> >>>> @@ -2534,22 +2534,6 @@ void hci_conn_hash_flush(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> >>>>        }
> >>>>    }
> >>>> -/* Check pending connect attempts */
> >>>> -void hci_conn_check_pending(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> >>>> -{
> >>>> -    struct hci_conn *conn;
> >>>> -
> >>>> -    BT_DBG("hdev %s", hdev->name);
> >>>> -
> >>>> -    hci_dev_lock(hdev);
> >>>> -
> >>>> -    conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_state(hdev, ACL_LINK, BT_CONNECT2);
> >>>> -    if (conn)
> >>>> -        hci_cmd_sync_queue(hdev, hci_acl_create_connection_sync,
> >>>> conn, NULL);
> >>>> -
> >>>> -    hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
> >>>> -}
> >>>> -
> >>>>    static u32 get_link_mode(struct hci_conn *conn)
> >>>>    {
> >>>>        u32 link_mode = 0;
> >>>> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> >>>> index e8b4a0126..91973d6d1 100644
> >>>> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> >>>> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> >>>> @@ -117,8 +117,6 @@ static u8 hci_cc_inquiry_cancel(struct hci_dev
> >>>> *hdev, void *data,
> >>>>            hci_discovery_set_state(hdev, DISCOVERY_STOPPED);
> >>>>        hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
> >>>> -    hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
> >>>> -
> >>>>        return rp->status;
> >>>>    }
> >>>> @@ -149,8 +147,6 @@ static u8 hci_cc_exit_periodic_inq(struct hci_dev
> >>>> *hdev, void *data,
> >>>>        hci_dev_clear_flag(hdev, HCI_PERIODIC_INQ);
> >>>> -    hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
> >>>> -
> >>>>        return rp->status;
> >>>>    }
> >>>> @@ -2296,10 +2292,8 @@ static void hci_cs_inquiry(struct hci_dev
> >>>> *hdev, __u8 status)
> >>>>    {
> >>>>        bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "status 0x%2.2x", status);
> >>>> -    if (status) {
> >>>> -        hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
> >>>> +    if (status)
> >>>>            return;
> >>>> -    }
> >>>>        set_bit(HCI_INQUIRY, &hdev->flags);
> >>>>    }
> >>>> @@ -2323,12 +2317,9 @@ static void hci_cs_create_conn(struct hci_dev
> >>>> *hdev, __u8 status)
> >>>>        if (status) {
> >>>>            if (conn && conn->state == BT_CONNECT) {
> >>>> -            if (status != HCI_ERROR_COMMAND_DISALLOWED ||
> >>>> conn->attempt > 2) {
> >>>> -                conn->state = BT_CLOSED;
> >>>> -                hci_connect_cfm(conn, status);
> >>>> -                hci_conn_del(conn);
> >>>> -            } else
> >>>> -                conn->state = BT_CONNECT2;
> >>>> +            conn->state = BT_CLOSED;
> >>>> +            hci_connect_cfm(conn, status);
> >>>> +            hci_conn_del(conn);
> >>>>            }
> >>>>        } else {
> >>>>            if (!conn) {
> >>>> @@ -3020,8 +3011,6 @@ static void hci_inquiry_complete_evt(struct
> >>>> hci_dev *hdev, void *data,
> >>>>        bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "status 0x%2.2x", ev->status);
> >>>> -    hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
> >>>> -
> >>>>        if (!test_and_clear_bit(HCI_INQUIRY, &hdev->flags))
> >>>>            return;
> >>>> @@ -3247,8 +3236,6 @@ static void hci_conn_complete_evt(struct hci_dev
> >>>> *hdev, void *data,
> >>>>    unlock:
> >>>>        hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
> >>>> -
> >>>> -    hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
> >>>>    }
> >>>>    static void hci_reject_conn(struct hci_dev *hdev, bdaddr_t *bdaddr)
> >>>
> >>> Please take a special look at this one: I'm not sure if I'm breaking the
> >>> functionality of deferred connecting using BT_CONNECT2 in
> >>> hci_conn_request_evt() here, as I don't see anywhere where we check for
> >>> this state and establish a connection later.
> >>>
> >>> It seems that this is how hci_conn_request_evt() was initially written
> >>> though, hci_conn_check_pending() only got introduced later and seems
> >>> unrelated.
> >>
> >> Ahh nevermind... The check for BT_CONNECT2 on "Conn Complete event" got
> >> introduced with 4c67bc74f01 ([Bluetooth] Support concurrent connect
> >> requests). And later the deferred connection setup on "Conn Request
> >> event" got introduced with 20714bfef8 ("Bluetooth: Implement deferred
> >> sco socket setup").
> >>
> >> I assume the latter commit was relying on the "Create Connection"
> >> request "Conn Complete event" that got introduced with the former commit
> >> then? That would imply that we use BT_CONNECT2 if there's already a
> >> "Create Connection" going on when the "Conn Request event" happens, and
> >> we must wait for that existing request to finish.. Is that how those
> >> deferred connections are supposed to work?
> >
> > Well if you are not sure that works we better make sure we have tests
> > that cover this, for LE I know for sure it works because we have the
> > likes of iso-tester that do connect 2 peers simultaneously, but for
> > classic I don't recall having any test that does multiple connections.
>
> The sequential "Create Connection" logic works, I tested that (of course
> I'm happy to add tests if it's not too much work).
>
> What I'm unsure about is if and how incoming connection requests from
> other devices with HCI_PROTO_DEFER flag are supposed to work and whether
> they are meant to trigger a "Create Connection" from us?

For incoming connections on Classic that should result in an
accept/reject connection command, so it should cause another Create
Connection if that is what you are afraid of.

> >
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Jonas
> >
> >
> >
Luiz Augusto von Dentz Jan. 8, 2024, 8:46 p.m. UTC | #3
Hi Jonas,

On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 3:26 PM Jonas Dreßler <verdre@v0yd.nl> wrote:
>
> Hi Luiz,
>
> On 1/8/24 20:41, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> > Hi Jonas,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 2:29 PM Jonas Dreßler <verdre@v0yd.nl> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Luiz,
> >>
> >> On 1/8/24 20:14, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> >>> Hi Jonas,
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 1:55 PM Jonas Dreßler <verdre@v0yd.nl> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 1/8/24 19:44, Jonas Dreßler wrote:
> >>>>> On 1/8/24 19:39, Jonas Dreßler wrote:
> >>>>>> With the last commit we moved to using the hci_sync queue for "Create
> >>>>>> Connection" requests, removing the need for retrying the paging after
> >>>>>> finished/failed "Create Connection" requests and after the end of
> >>>>>> inquiries.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> hci_conn_check_pending() was used to trigger this retry, we can remove it
> >>>>>> now.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Note that we can also remove the special handling for COMMAND_DISALLOWED
> >>>>>> errors in the completion handler of "Create Connection", because "Create
> >>>>>> Connection" requests are now always serialized.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This is somewhat reverting commit 4c67bc74f016 ("[Bluetooth] Support
> >>>>>> concurrent connect requests").
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> With this, the BT_CONNECT2 state of ACL hci_conn objects should now be
> >>>>>> back to meaning only one thing: That we received a connection request
> >>>>>> from another device (see hci_conn_request_evt), but the actual connect
> >>>>>> should be deferred.
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>     include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h |  1 -
> >>>>>>     net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c         | 16 ----------------
> >>>>>>     net/bluetooth/hci_event.c        | 21 ++++-----------------
> >>>>>>     3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> >>>>>> b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> >>>>>> index 2c30834c1..d7483958d 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> >>>>>> +++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
> >>>>>> @@ -1330,7 +1330,6 @@ struct hci_conn *hci_conn_add(struct hci_dev
> >>>>>> *hdev, int type, bdaddr_t *dst,
> >>>>>>                       u8 role);
> >>>>>>     void hci_conn_del(struct hci_conn *conn);
> >>>>>>     void hci_conn_hash_flush(struct hci_dev *hdev);
> >>>>>> -void hci_conn_check_pending(struct hci_dev *hdev);
> >>>>>>     struct hci_chan *hci_chan_create(struct hci_conn *conn);
> >>>>>>     void hci_chan_del(struct hci_chan *chan);
> >>>>>> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
> >>>>>> index 541d55301..22033057b 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
> >>>>>> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
> >>>>>> @@ -2534,22 +2534,6 @@ void hci_conn_hash_flush(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> >>>>>>         }
> >>>>>>     }
> >>>>>> -/* Check pending connect attempts */
> >>>>>> -void hci_conn_check_pending(struct hci_dev *hdev)
> >>>>>> -{
> >>>>>> -    struct hci_conn *conn;
> >>>>>> -
> >>>>>> -    BT_DBG("hdev %s", hdev->name);
> >>>>>> -
> >>>>>> -    hci_dev_lock(hdev);
> >>>>>> -
> >>>>>> -    conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_state(hdev, ACL_LINK, BT_CONNECT2);
> >>>>>> -    if (conn)
> >>>>>> -        hci_cmd_sync_queue(hdev, hci_acl_create_connection_sync,
> >>>>>> conn, NULL);
> >>>>>> -
> >>>>>> -    hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
> >>>>>> -}
> >>>>>> -
> >>>>>>     static u32 get_link_mode(struct hci_conn *conn)
> >>>>>>     {
> >>>>>>         u32 link_mode = 0;
> >>>>>> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> >>>>>> index e8b4a0126..91973d6d1 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> >>>>>> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
> >>>>>> @@ -117,8 +117,6 @@ static u8 hci_cc_inquiry_cancel(struct hci_dev
> >>>>>> *hdev, void *data,
> >>>>>>             hci_discovery_set_state(hdev, DISCOVERY_STOPPED);
> >>>>>>         hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
> >>>>>> -    hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
> >>>>>> -
> >>>>>>         return rp->status;
> >>>>>>     }
> >>>>>> @@ -149,8 +147,6 @@ static u8 hci_cc_exit_periodic_inq(struct hci_dev
> >>>>>> *hdev, void *data,
> >>>>>>         hci_dev_clear_flag(hdev, HCI_PERIODIC_INQ);
> >>>>>> -    hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
> >>>>>> -
> >>>>>>         return rp->status;
> >>>>>>     }
> >>>>>> @@ -2296,10 +2292,8 @@ static void hci_cs_inquiry(struct hci_dev
> >>>>>> *hdev, __u8 status)
> >>>>>>     {
> >>>>>>         bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "status 0x%2.2x", status);
> >>>>>> -    if (status) {
> >>>>>> -        hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
> >>>>>> +    if (status)
> >>>>>>             return;
> >>>>>> -    }
> >>>>>>         set_bit(HCI_INQUIRY, &hdev->flags);
> >>>>>>     }
> >>>>>> @@ -2323,12 +2317,9 @@ static void hci_cs_create_conn(struct hci_dev
> >>>>>> *hdev, __u8 status)
> >>>>>>         if (status) {
> >>>>>>             if (conn && conn->state == BT_CONNECT) {
> >>>>>> -            if (status != HCI_ERROR_COMMAND_DISALLOWED ||
> >>>>>> conn->attempt > 2) {
> >>>>>> -                conn->state = BT_CLOSED;
> >>>>>> -                hci_connect_cfm(conn, status);
> >>>>>> -                hci_conn_del(conn);
> >>>>>> -            } else
> >>>>>> -                conn->state = BT_CONNECT2;
> >>>>>> +            conn->state = BT_CLOSED;
> >>>>>> +            hci_connect_cfm(conn, status);
> >>>>>> +            hci_conn_del(conn);
> >>>>>>             }
> >>>>>>         } else {
> >>>>>>             if (!conn) {
> >>>>>> @@ -3020,8 +3011,6 @@ static void hci_inquiry_complete_evt(struct
> >>>>>> hci_dev *hdev, void *data,
> >>>>>>         bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "status 0x%2.2x", ev->status);
> >>>>>> -    hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
> >>>>>> -
> >>>>>>         if (!test_and_clear_bit(HCI_INQUIRY, &hdev->flags))
> >>>>>>             return;
> >>>>>> @@ -3247,8 +3236,6 @@ static void hci_conn_complete_evt(struct hci_dev
> >>>>>> *hdev, void *data,
> >>>>>>     unlock:
> >>>>>>         hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
> >>>>>> -
> >>>>>> -    hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
> >>>>>>     }
> >>>>>>     static void hci_reject_conn(struct hci_dev *hdev, bdaddr_t *bdaddr)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please take a special look at this one: I'm not sure if I'm breaking the
> >>>>> functionality of deferred connecting using BT_CONNECT2 in
> >>>>> hci_conn_request_evt() here, as I don't see anywhere where we check for
> >>>>> this state and establish a connection later.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It seems that this is how hci_conn_request_evt() was initially written
> >>>>> though, hci_conn_check_pending() only got introduced later and seems
> >>>>> unrelated.
> >>>>
> >>>> Ahh nevermind... The check for BT_CONNECT2 on "Conn Complete event" got
> >>>> introduced with 4c67bc74f01 ([Bluetooth] Support concurrent connect
> >>>> requests). And later the deferred connection setup on "Conn Request
> >>>> event" got introduced with 20714bfef8 ("Bluetooth: Implement deferred
> >>>> sco socket setup").
> >>>>
> >>>> I assume the latter commit was relying on the "Create Connection"
> >>>> request "Conn Complete event" that got introduced with the former commit
> >>>> then? That would imply that we use BT_CONNECT2 if there's already a
> >>>> "Create Connection" going on when the "Conn Request event" happens, and
> >>>> we must wait for that existing request to finish.. Is that how those
> >>>> deferred connections are supposed to work?
> >>>
> >>> Well if you are not sure that works we better make sure we have tests
> >>> that cover this, for LE I know for sure it works because we have the
> >>> likes of iso-tester that do connect 2 peers simultaneously, but for
> >>> classic I don't recall having any test that does multiple connections.
> >>
> >> The sequential "Create Connection" logic works, I tested that (of course
> >> I'm happy to add tests if it's not too much work).
> >>
> >> What I'm unsure about is if and how incoming connection requests from
> >> other devices with HCI_PROTO_DEFER flag are supposed to work and whether
> >> they are meant to trigger a "Create Connection" from us?
> >
> > For incoming connections on Classic that should result in an
> > accept/reject connection command, so it should cause another Create
> > Connection if that is what you are afraid of.
> >
>
> Hmm, do you mean it *shouldn't* cause another "Create Connection"?

Yeah, sorry about that, it is Monday I should probably double check if
what I wrote makes any sense before sending :D

> I just checked in the spec: It sounds like once we send the "Accept
> Connection Request" to the controller, the controller takes care of
> establishing the connection by itself (no "Create Connection"
> necessary), and will then later give us a "Connection Complete" event to
> indicate that the connection is done.

Yep, it will follow up with a Connection Complete.

> If I'm reading all this correctly, that sounds like my commit is
> correct, and we had a bug in this logic before by interpreting
> BT_CONNECT2 in two different ways.
>
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Jonas
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
index 2c30834c1..d7483958d 100644
--- a/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
+++ b/include/net/bluetooth/hci_core.h
@@ -1330,7 +1330,6 @@  struct hci_conn *hci_conn_add(struct hci_dev *hdev, int type, bdaddr_t *dst,
 			      u8 role);
 void hci_conn_del(struct hci_conn *conn);
 void hci_conn_hash_flush(struct hci_dev *hdev);
-void hci_conn_check_pending(struct hci_dev *hdev);
 
 struct hci_chan *hci_chan_create(struct hci_conn *conn);
 void hci_chan_del(struct hci_chan *chan);
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
index 541d55301..22033057b 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_conn.c
@@ -2534,22 +2534,6 @@  void hci_conn_hash_flush(struct hci_dev *hdev)
 	}
 }
 
-/* Check pending connect attempts */
-void hci_conn_check_pending(struct hci_dev *hdev)
-{
-	struct hci_conn *conn;
-
-	BT_DBG("hdev %s", hdev->name);
-
-	hci_dev_lock(hdev);
-
-	conn = hci_conn_hash_lookup_state(hdev, ACL_LINK, BT_CONNECT2);
-	if (conn)
-		hci_cmd_sync_queue(hdev, hci_acl_create_connection_sync, conn, NULL);
-
-	hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
-}
-
 static u32 get_link_mode(struct hci_conn *conn)
 {
 	u32 link_mode = 0;
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
index e8b4a0126..91973d6d1 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_event.c
@@ -117,8 +117,6 @@  static u8 hci_cc_inquiry_cancel(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data,
 		hci_discovery_set_state(hdev, DISCOVERY_STOPPED);
 	hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
 
-	hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
-
 	return rp->status;
 }
 
@@ -149,8 +147,6 @@  static u8 hci_cc_exit_periodic_inq(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data,
 
 	hci_dev_clear_flag(hdev, HCI_PERIODIC_INQ);
 
-	hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
-
 	return rp->status;
 }
 
@@ -2296,10 +2292,8 @@  static void hci_cs_inquiry(struct hci_dev *hdev, __u8 status)
 {
 	bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "status 0x%2.2x", status);
 
-	if (status) {
-		hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
+	if (status)
 		return;
-	}
 
 	set_bit(HCI_INQUIRY, &hdev->flags);
 }
@@ -2323,12 +2317,9 @@  static void hci_cs_create_conn(struct hci_dev *hdev, __u8 status)
 
 	if (status) {
 		if (conn && conn->state == BT_CONNECT) {
-			if (status != HCI_ERROR_COMMAND_DISALLOWED || conn->attempt > 2) {
-				conn->state = BT_CLOSED;
-				hci_connect_cfm(conn, status);
-				hci_conn_del(conn);
-			} else
-				conn->state = BT_CONNECT2;
+			conn->state = BT_CLOSED;
+			hci_connect_cfm(conn, status);
+			hci_conn_del(conn);
 		}
 	} else {
 		if (!conn) {
@@ -3020,8 +3011,6 @@  static void hci_inquiry_complete_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data,
 
 	bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "status 0x%2.2x", ev->status);
 
-	hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
-
 	if (!test_and_clear_bit(HCI_INQUIRY, &hdev->flags))
 		return;
 
@@ -3247,8 +3236,6 @@  static void hci_conn_complete_evt(struct hci_dev *hdev, void *data,
 
 unlock:
 	hci_dev_unlock(hdev);
-
-	hci_conn_check_pending(hdev);
 }
 
 static void hci_reject_conn(struct hci_dev *hdev, bdaddr_t *bdaddr)