diff mbox

[v3,2/3] hwmon: xgene: Add hwmon driver

Message ID 20160909031809.GG16712@linaro.org
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

AKASHI Takahiro Sept. 9, 2016, 3:18 a.m. UTC
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:47:59AM +0100, James Morse wrote:
> Hi,

> 

> On 08/09/16 09:14, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> > On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 3:37:05 PM CEST Guenter Roeck wrote:

> >> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 11:41:44PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> >>> On Thursday, July 21, 2016 1:55:56 PM CEST Hoan Tran wrote:

> >>>> +               ctx->comm_base_addr = cppc_ss->base_address;

> >>>> +               if (ctx->comm_base_addr) {

> >>>> +                       ctx->pcc_comm_addr =

> >>>> +                                       acpi_os_ioremap(ctx->comm_base_addr,

> >>>> +                                                       cppc_ss->length);

> >>>>

> >>>

> >>> This causes the arm64 allmodconfig build to fail now, according to

> >>> kernelci:

> >>>

> >>>       1  ERROR: "memblock_is_memory" [drivers/hwmon/xgene-hwmon.ko] undefined!

> >>>

> >>> Should this perhaps call ioremap() or memremap() instead?

> >>>

> >> Hmmm ... almost sounds to me like blaming the messenger. e7cd190385d1 ("arm64:

> >> mark reserved memblock regions explicitly in iomem") starts using a function

> >> in acpi_os_ioremap() which is not exported. On top of that, memblock_is_memory()

> >> is declared as __init_memblock, which makes me really uncomfortable.

> >> If acpi_os_ioremap() must not be used by modules, and possibly only during

> >> early (?) initialization, maybe its declaration should state those limitations ?

> > 

> > Ah, I didn't notice that. I guess both patches were correct individually and

> > got added to linux-next around the same time but caused allmodconfig to blow up

> > when used together.

> > 

> > Adding everyone who was involved in the memblock patch to Cc here, maybe one

> > of them has an idea what the correct fix is. There are only two other drivers

> > using acpi_os_ioremap() and one of them is x86-specific, so it's still likely

> > that drivers are not actually supposed to use this symbol. Making

> > acpi_os_ioremap() an exported function in arm64 would also work.

> 

> You could use acpi_os_map_iomem()/acpi_os_unmap_iomem() from acpi/acpi_io.h.

> If there isn't an existing mapping these end up in acpi_os_ioremap(), and are

> already EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL().


acpi_os_ioremap() is re-defined in arm64/include/asm/acpi.h.

The problem is that, as memblock_is_memory() is declared as __init,
we cannot build any drivers which call acpi_os_ioremap() as modules.

As far as this specific issue is concerned, if we make a change like:

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
===>8===

The build error will be gone. (and still kdump should work.)

But I don't know how we should distinguish IORESOURCE_MEM and
IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM.

Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI

> (I'm still waiting for allmodconfig on linux-next to finish building)

> 

> 

> Thanks,

> 

> James

> 

> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Comments

James Morse Sept. 9, 2016, 9:31 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi,

On 09/09/16 04:18, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:47:59AM +0100, James Morse wrote:

>> On 08/09/16 09:14, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

>>> On Wednesday, September 7, 2016 3:37:05 PM CEST Guenter Roeck wrote:

>>>> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 11:41:44PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

>>>>> On Thursday, July 21, 2016 1:55:56 PM CEST Hoan Tran wrote:

>>>>>> +               ctx->comm_base_addr = cppc_ss->base_address;

>>>>>> +               if (ctx->comm_base_addr) {

>>>>>> +                       ctx->pcc_comm_addr =

>>>>>> +                                       acpi_os_ioremap(ctx->comm_base_addr,

>>>>>> +                                                       cppc_ss->length);

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> This causes the arm64 allmodconfig build to fail now, according to

>>>>> kernelci:

>>>>>

>>>>>       1  ERROR: "memblock_is_memory" [drivers/hwmon/xgene-hwmon.ko] undefined!

>>>>>

>>>>> Should this perhaps call ioremap() or memremap() instead?

>>>>>

>>>> Hmmm ... almost sounds to me like blaming the messenger. e7cd190385d1 ("arm64:

>>>> mark reserved memblock regions explicitly in iomem") starts using a function

>>>> in acpi_os_ioremap() which is not exported. On top of that, memblock_is_memory()

>>>> is declared as __init_memblock, which makes me really uncomfortable.

>>>> If acpi_os_ioremap() must not be used by modules, and possibly only during

>>>> early (?) initialization, maybe its declaration should state those limitations ?

>>>

>>> Ah, I didn't notice that. I guess both patches were correct individually and

>>> got added to linux-next around the same time but caused allmodconfig to blow up

>>> when used together.

>>>

>>> Adding everyone who was involved in the memblock patch to Cc here, maybe one

>>> of them has an idea what the correct fix is. There are only two other drivers

>>> using acpi_os_ioremap() and one of them is x86-specific, so it's still likely

>>> that drivers are not actually supposed to use this symbol. Making

>>> acpi_os_ioremap() an exported function in arm64 would also work.

>>

>> You could use acpi_os_map_iomem()/acpi_os_unmap_iomem() from acpi/acpi_io.h.

>> If there isn't an existing mapping these end up in acpi_os_ioremap(), and are

>> already EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL().

> 

> acpi_os_ioremap() is re-defined in arm64/include/asm/acpi.h.

> 

> The problem is that, as memblock_is_memory() is declared as __init,


__init_memblock ...

... as is memblock_is_map_memory(), which we call from pfn_valid() which is
EXPORT_SYMBOL()'d
and used from modules, (e.g. mac80211.ko). So something fishy is going on...

From include/linux/memblock.h:
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK

> #define __init_memblock __meminit

> #define __initdata_memblock __meminitdata

> #else

> #define __init_memblock

> #define __initdata_memblock

> #endif


arm64 doesn't define ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK, so we always keep these symbols.
If we didn't, pfn_valid() would break too.


Thanks,

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

===8<===
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c
@@ -207,7 +207,7 @@  static void __init request_standard_resources(void)
                res = alloc_bootmem_low(sizeof(*res));
                if (memblock_is_nomap(region)) {
                        res->name  = "reserved";
-                       res->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
+                       res->flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
                } else {
                        res->name  = "System RAM";
                        res->flags = IORESOURCE_SYSTEM_RAM | IORESOURCE_BUSY;
===>8===

and revert the following hunk from the commit:

===8<===
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/acpi.h
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ 
 #ifndef _ASM_ACPI_H
 #define _ASM_ACPI_H
 
-#include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/memblock.h>
 #include <linux/psci.h>
 
 #include <asm/cputype.h>
@@ -32,7 +32,11 @@ 
 static inline void __iomem *acpi_os_ioremap(acpi_physical_address phys,
                                            acpi_size size)
 {
-       if (!page_is_ram(phys >> PAGE_SHIFT))
+       /*
+        * EFI's reserve_regions() call adds memory with the WB attribute
+        * to memblock via early_init_dt_add_memory_arch().
+        */
+       if (!memblock_is_memory(phys))
                return ioremap(phys, size);
 
        return ioremap_cache(phys, size);