@@ -700,7 +700,7 @@ static void test_overflow(bool test_e2big_overflow, bool ret1)
goto free_link;
buf = malloc(expected_read_len);
- if (!buf)
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(buf, "malloc"))
goto close_iter;
/* do read */
@@ -871,6 +871,10 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_hash_map(void)
skel->rodata->num_cpus = bpf_num_possible_cpus();
val = malloc(8 * bpf_num_possible_cpus());
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(val, "malloc")) {
+ bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_hash_map__destroy(skel);
+ return;
+ }
err = bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_hash_map__load(skel);
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_hash_map__load"))
@@ -1048,6 +1052,10 @@ static void test_bpf_percpu_array_map(void)
skel->rodata->num_cpus = bpf_num_possible_cpus();
val = malloc(8 * bpf_num_possible_cpus());
+ if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(val, "malloc")) {
+ bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_array_map__destroy(skel);
+ return;
+ }
err = bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_array_map__load(skel);
if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "bpf_iter_bpf_percpu_array_map__load"))
Since some malloc calls in bpf_iter may at times fail, this patch adds the appropriate fail checks, and ensures that any previously allocated resource is appropriately destroyed before returning the function. This is patch 2 in the sequence should be applied after d1a88d37cecc "selftests/bpf: Convert CHECK macros to ASSERT_* macros in bpf_iter" Patch 1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/DB3PR10MB683589A5F705C6CA5BE0D325E8DFA@DB3PR10MB6835.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM Signed-off-by: Yuran Pereira <yuran.pereira@hotmail.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_iter.c | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)