Message ID | 20231020170009.86870-3-philmd@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | stm32f2xx_usart: implement TX interrupts | expand |
On 10/20/23 10:00, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > From: Hans-Erik Floryd <hans-erik.floryd@rt-labs.com> > > Signed-off-by: Hans-Erik Floryd <hans-erik.floryd@rt-labs.com> > [PMD: Split from bigger patch] > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> > --- > Is this required? > --- > hw/char/stm32f2xx_usart.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/hw/char/stm32f2xx_usart.c b/hw/char/stm32f2xx_usart.c > index 519d3461a3..46e29089bc 100644 > --- a/hw/char/stm32f2xx_usart.c > +++ b/hw/char/stm32f2xx_usart.c > @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ static uint64_t stm32f2xx_usart_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, > case USART_SR: > retvalue = s->usart_sr; > qemu_chr_fe_accept_input(&s->chr); > + stm32f2xx_update_irq(s); > return retvalue; > case USART_DR: > DB_PRINT("Value: 0x%" PRIx32 ", %c\n", s->usart_dr, (char) s->usart_dr); Is there a status bit change missing? There doesn't seem to be anything to update here. r~
On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 4:12 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> wrote: > > From: Hans-Erik Floryd <hans-erik.floryd@rt-labs.com> > > Signed-off-by: Hans-Erik Floryd <hans-erik.floryd@rt-labs.com> > [PMD: Split from bigger patch] > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> > --- > Is this required? I don't think this is required Alistair > --- > hw/char/stm32f2xx_usart.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/hw/char/stm32f2xx_usart.c b/hw/char/stm32f2xx_usart.c > index 519d3461a3..46e29089bc 100644 > --- a/hw/char/stm32f2xx_usart.c > +++ b/hw/char/stm32f2xx_usart.c > @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ static uint64_t stm32f2xx_usart_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, > case USART_SR: > retvalue = s->usart_sr; > qemu_chr_fe_accept_input(&s->chr); > + stm32f2xx_update_irq(s); > return retvalue; > case USART_DR: > DB_PRINT("Value: 0x%" PRIx32 ", %c\n", s->usart_dr, (char) s->usart_dr); > -- > 2.41.0 > >
On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 at 03:37, Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 4:12 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé > <philmd@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > From: Hans-Erik Floryd <hans-erik.floryd@rt-labs.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: Hans-Erik Floryd <hans-erik.floryd@rt-labs.com> > > [PMD: Split from bigger patch] > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> > > --- > > Is this required? > > I don't think this is required > > Alistair I agree this should be removed. It was added because the manual says that some irq:s are cleared by a combination of reading SR and writing to DR. However, those bits are not implemented yet, and probably the clearing should be done when writing DR anyway. Thanks for reviewing, Hans-Erik
diff --git a/hw/char/stm32f2xx_usart.c b/hw/char/stm32f2xx_usart.c index 519d3461a3..46e29089bc 100644 --- a/hw/char/stm32f2xx_usart.c +++ b/hw/char/stm32f2xx_usart.c @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ static uint64_t stm32f2xx_usart_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, case USART_SR: retvalue = s->usart_sr; qemu_chr_fe_accept_input(&s->chr); + stm32f2xx_update_irq(s); return retvalue; case USART_DR: DB_PRINT("Value: 0x%" PRIx32 ", %c\n", s->usart_dr, (char) s->usart_dr);