diff mbox series

[v5] gpio: sim: don't fiddle with GPIOLIB private members

Message ID 20230911110740.16284-1-brgl@bgdev.pl
State New
Headers show
Series [v5] gpio: sim: don't fiddle with GPIOLIB private members | expand

Commit Message

Bartosz Golaszewski Sept. 11, 2023, 11:07 a.m. UTC 
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>

We access internals of struct gpio_device and struct gpio_desc because
it's easier but it can actually be avoided and we're working towards a
better encapsulation of GPIO data structures across the kernel so let's
start at home.

Instead of checking gpio_desc flags, let's just track the requests of
GPIOs in the driver. We also already store the information about
direction of simulated lines.

For kobjects needed by sysfs callbacks: we can iterate over the children
devices of the top-level platform device and compare their fwnodes
against the one passed to the init function from probe.

While at it: fix one line break and remove the untrue part about
configfs callbacks using dev_get_drvdata() from a comment.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
---
v1 -> v2:
- use get_dev_from_fwnode() instead of dereferencing fwnode directly

v2 -> v3:
- don't use fwnode internal fields, instead: iterate over the platform
  device's children and locate the GPIO device

v3 -> v4:
- use device_find_child() (not bus_device_find_by_fwnode() as it's
  pointless to iterate over all platform devices)
- use device_match_fwnode() for matching the device by fwnode

v4 -> v5:
- don't include linux/device/bus.h, rely on device.h already pulling it
- drop a comment about pointer mismatch for the callback function pointer
  in device_find_child

 drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

Comments

Bartosz Golaszewski Sept. 11, 2023, 12:57 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 2:56 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 2:54 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 01:07:40PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> > >
> > > We access internals of struct gpio_device and struct gpio_desc because
> > > it's easier but it can actually be avoided and we're working towards a
> > > better encapsulation of GPIO data structures across the kernel so let's
> > > start at home.
> > >
> > > Instead of checking gpio_desc flags, let's just track the requests of
> > > GPIOs in the driver. We also already store the information about
> > > direction of simulated lines.
> > >
> > > For kobjects needed by sysfs callbacks: we can iterate over the children
> > > devices of the top-level platform device and compare their fwnodes
> > > against the one passed to the init function from probe.
> > >
> > > While at it: fix one line break and remove the untrue part about
> > > configfs callbacks using dev_get_drvdata() from a comment.
> >
> > (Just wondering if you used --patience)
> >
>
> I may have forgotten this one time. I need to add an alias.
>

Ah, I can do "git config --global diff.algorithm patience". Will use
it from now.

Bart

> Bart
>
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > --
> > With Best Regards,
> > Andy Shevchenko
> >
> >
Bartosz Golaszewski Sept. 12, 2023, 7:30 a.m. UTC | #2 
On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 1:07 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl> wrote:
>
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
>
> We access internals of struct gpio_device and struct gpio_desc because
> it's easier but it can actually be avoided and we're working towards a
> better encapsulation of GPIO data structures across the kernel so let's
> start at home.
>
> Instead of checking gpio_desc flags, let's just track the requests of
> GPIOs in the driver. We also already store the information about
> direction of simulated lines.
>
> For kobjects needed by sysfs callbacks: we can iterate over the children
> devices of the top-level platform device and compare their fwnodes
> against the one passed to the init function from probe.
>
> While at it: fix one line break and remove the untrue part about
> configfs callbacks using dev_get_drvdata() from a comment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
> ---

Patch applied.

Bart
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c
index 271db3639a78..2b9d9e172d5d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/completion.h>
 #include <linux/configfs.h>
 #include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
 #include <linux/gpio/driver.h>
 #include <linux/gpio/machine.h>
 #include <linux/idr.h>
@@ -30,8 +31,6 @@ 
 #include <linux/string_helpers.h>
 #include <linux/sysfs.h>
 
-#include "gpiolib.h"
-
 #define GPIO_SIM_NGPIO_MAX	1024
 #define GPIO_SIM_PROP_MAX	4 /* Max 3 properties + sentinel. */
 #define GPIO_SIM_NUM_ATTRS	3 /* value, pull and sentinel */
@@ -40,6 +39,8 @@  static DEFINE_IDA(gpio_sim_ida);
 
 struct gpio_sim_chip {
 	struct gpio_chip gc;
+	struct device *dev;
+	unsigned long *request_map;
 	unsigned long *direction_map;
 	unsigned long *value_map;
 	unsigned long *pull_map;
@@ -63,16 +64,11 @@  static int gpio_sim_apply_pull(struct gpio_sim_chip *chip,
 			       unsigned int offset, int value)
 {
 	int irq, irq_type, ret;
-	struct gpio_desc *desc;
-	struct gpio_chip *gc;
-
-	gc = &chip->gc;
-	desc = &gc->gpiodev->descs[offset];
 
 	guard(mutex)(&chip->lock);
 
-	if (test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags) &&
-	    !test_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT, &desc->flags)) {
+	if (test_bit(offset, chip->request_map) &&
+	    test_bit(offset, chip->direction_map)) {
 		if (value == !!test_bit(offset, chip->value_map))
 			goto set_pull;
 
@@ -99,8 +95,8 @@  static int gpio_sim_apply_pull(struct gpio_sim_chip *chip,
 
 set_value:
 	/* Change the value unless we're actively driving the line. */
-	if (!test_bit(FLAG_REQUESTED, &desc->flags) ||
-	    !test_bit(FLAG_IS_OUT, &desc->flags))
+	if (!test_bit(offset, chip->request_map) ||
+	    test_bit(offset, chip->direction_map))
 		__assign_bit(offset, chip->value_map, value);
 
 set_pull:
@@ -180,8 +176,8 @@  static int gpio_sim_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
 	return direction ? GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_IN : GPIO_LINE_DIRECTION_OUT;
 }
 
-static int gpio_sim_set_config(struct gpio_chip *gc,
-				  unsigned int offset, unsigned long config)
+static int gpio_sim_set_config(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset,
+			       unsigned long config)
 {
 	struct gpio_sim_chip *chip = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
 
@@ -204,13 +200,25 @@  static int gpio_sim_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
 	return irq_create_mapping(chip->irq_sim, offset);
 }
 
-static void gpio_sim_free(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
+static int gpio_sim_request(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
 {
 	struct gpio_sim_chip *chip = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
 
 	scoped_guard(mutex, &chip->lock)
+		__set_bit(offset, chip->request_map);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void gpio_sim_free(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
+{
+	struct gpio_sim_chip *chip = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
+
+	scoped_guard(mutex, &chip->lock) {
 		__assign_bit(offset, chip->value_map,
 			     !!test_bit(offset, chip->pull_map));
+		__clear_bit(offset, chip->request_map);
+	}
 }
 
 static ssize_t gpio_sim_sysfs_val_show(struct device *dev,
@@ -282,6 +290,13 @@  static void gpio_sim_mutex_destroy(void *data)
 	mutex_destroy(lock);
 }
 
+static void gpio_sim_put_device(void *data)
+{
+	struct device *dev = data;
+
+	put_device(dev);
+}
+
 static void gpio_sim_dispose_mappings(void *data)
 {
 	struct gpio_sim_chip *chip = data;
@@ -295,7 +310,7 @@  static void gpio_sim_sysfs_remove(void *data)
 {
 	struct gpio_sim_chip *chip = data;
 
-	sysfs_remove_groups(&chip->gc.gpiodev->dev.kobj, chip->attr_groups);
+	sysfs_remove_groups(&chip->dev->kobj, chip->attr_groups);
 }
 
 static int gpio_sim_setup_sysfs(struct gpio_sim_chip *chip)
@@ -352,14 +367,18 @@  static int gpio_sim_setup_sysfs(struct gpio_sim_chip *chip)
 		chip->attr_groups[i] = attr_group;
 	}
 
-	ret = sysfs_create_groups(&chip->gc.gpiodev->dev.kobj,
-				  chip->attr_groups);
+	ret = sysfs_create_groups(&chip->dev->kobj, chip->attr_groups);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
 	return devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, gpio_sim_sysfs_remove, chip);
 }
 
+static int gpio_sim_dev_match_fwnode(struct device *dev, void *data)
+{
+	return device_match_fwnode(dev, data);
+}
+
 static int gpio_sim_add_bank(struct fwnode_handle *swnode, struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct gpio_sim_chip *chip;
@@ -387,6 +406,10 @@  static int gpio_sim_add_bank(struct fwnode_handle *swnode, struct device *dev)
 	if (!chip)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	chip->request_map = devm_bitmap_zalloc(dev, num_lines, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!chip->request_map)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
 	chip->direction_map = devm_bitmap_alloc(dev, num_lines, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!chip->direction_map)
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -432,6 +455,7 @@  static int gpio_sim_add_bank(struct fwnode_handle *swnode, struct device *dev)
 	gc->get_direction = gpio_sim_get_direction;
 	gc->set_config = gpio_sim_set_config;
 	gc->to_irq = gpio_sim_to_irq;
+	gc->request = gpio_sim_request;
 	gc->free = gpio_sim_free;
 	gc->can_sleep = true;
 
@@ -439,8 +463,16 @@  static int gpio_sim_add_bank(struct fwnode_handle *swnode, struct device *dev)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	/* Used by sysfs and configfs callbacks. */
-	dev_set_drvdata(&gc->gpiodev->dev, chip);
+	chip->dev = device_find_child(dev, swnode, gpio_sim_dev_match_fwnode);
+	if (!chip->dev)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, gpio_sim_put_device, chip->dev);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	/* Used by sysfs callbacks. */
+	dev_set_drvdata(chip->dev, chip);
 
 	return gpio_sim_setup_sysfs(chip);
 }