Message ID | 20230907094517.1961-1-luhongfei@vivo.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | None | expand |
Hi Lu, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on mkp-scsi/for-next] [also build test ERROR on jejb-scsi/for-next linus/master v6.5 next-20230907] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Lu-Hongfei/scsi-ufs-core-allow-host-driver-to-enable-wb-buffer-resize-function/20230907-234105 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkp/scsi.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907094517.1961-1-luhongfei%40vivo.com patch subject: [PATCH 3/3] scsi: ufs: core: Add exception event handler to implicitly handle WB buffer resize event config: hexagon-randconfig-002-20230908 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230908/202309080646.NhYcVypx-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 4a5ac14ee968ff0ad5d2cc1ffa0299048db4c88a) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230908/202309080646.NhYcVypx-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309080646.NhYcVypx-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c:18: In file included from include/linux/blkdev.h:9: In file included from include/linux/blk_types.h:10: In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:10: In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12: In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11: In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1: In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:334: include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 547 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 560 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu' 37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x)) | ^ In file included from drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c:18: In file included from include/linux/blkdev.h:9: In file included from include/linux/blk_types.h:10: In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:10: In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12: In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11: In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1: In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:334: include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 573 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu' 35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x)) | ^ In file included from drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c:18: In file included from include/linux/blkdev.h:9: In file included from include/linux/blk_types.h:10: In file included from include/linux/bvec.h:10: In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:12: In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11: In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1: In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:334: include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 584 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 594 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 604 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ >> drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c:322:19: error: member reference type 'struct ufs_dev_info' is not a pointer; did you mean to use '.'? 322 | if (hba->dev_info->wspecversion >= 0x410 | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~ | . drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c:323:22: error: member reference type 'struct ufs_dev_info' is not a pointer; did you mean to use '.'? 323 | && hba->dev_info->b_presrv_uspc_en | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~ | . >> drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c:326:3: error: call to undeclared function 'ufshcd_enable_ee'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 326 | ufshcd_enable_ee(hba, mask); | ^ drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c:326:3: note: did you mean 'ufshcd_enable_irq'? drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c:291:20: note: 'ufshcd_enable_irq' declared here 291 | static inline void ufshcd_enable_irq(struct ufs_hba *hba) | ^ >> drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c:5642:19: error: static declaration of 'ufshcd_enable_ee' follows non-static declaration 5642 | static inline int ufshcd_enable_ee(struct ufs_hba *hba, u16 mask) | ^ drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c:326:3: note: previous implicit declaration is here 326 | ufshcd_enable_ee(hba, mask); | ^ drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c:10216:44: warning: shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow] 10216 | if (!dma_set_mask_and_coherent(hba->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64))) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/dma-mapping.h:77:54: note: expanded from macro 'DMA_BIT_MASK' 77 | #define DMA_BIT_MASK(n) (((n) == 64) ? ~0ULL : ((1ULL<<(n))-1)) | ^ ~~~ 7 warnings and 4 errors generated. vim +322 drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c 306 307 static void ufshcd_configure_wb(struct ufs_hba *hba) 308 { 309 u16 mask = 0; 310 311 if (!ufshcd_is_wb_allowed(hba)) 312 return; 313 314 ufshcd_wb_toggle(hba, true); 315 316 ufshcd_wb_toggle_buf_flush_during_h8(hba, true); 317 318 if (ufshcd_is_wb_buf_flush_allowed(hba)) 319 ufshcd_wb_toggle_buf_flush(hba, true); 320 321 /* Enable the WRITEBOOSTER_RESIZE_HINT exception mechanism. */ > 322 if (hba->dev_info->wspecversion >= 0x410 323 && hba->dev_info->b_presrv_uspc_en 324 && ufshcd_is_wb_buf_resize_allowed(hba)) { 325 mask |= MASK_EE_WRITEBOOSTER_RESIZE_HINT; > 326 ufshcd_enable_ee(hba, mask); 327 } 328 } 329
Hi Lu,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on mkp-scsi/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on jejb-scsi/for-next linus/master v6.5 next-20230907]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Lu-Hongfei/scsi-ufs-core-allow-host-driver-to-enable-wb-buffer-resize-function/20230907-234105
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkp/scsi.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230907094517.1961-1-luhongfei%40vivo.com
patch subject: [PATCH 3/3] scsi: ufs: core: Add exception event handler to implicitly handle WB buffer resize event
config: x86_64-randconfig-r036-20230908 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230908/202309080739.i8Muq8IT-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-6ubuntu2) 7.5.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230908/202309080739.i8Muq8IT-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309080739.i8Muq8IT-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c: In function 'ufshcd_configure_wb':
drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c:322:19: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'struct ufs_dev_info')
if (hba->dev_info->wspecversion >= 0x410
^~
drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c:323:22: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'struct ufs_dev_info')
&& hba->dev_info->b_presrv_uspc_en
^~
drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c:326:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'ufshcd_enable_ee'; did you mean 'ufshcd_enable_irq'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
ufshcd_enable_ee(hba, mask);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ufshcd_enable_irq
drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c: At top level:
>> drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c:5642:19: error: conflicting types for 'ufshcd_enable_ee'
static inline int ufshcd_enable_ee(struct ufs_hba *hba, u16 mask)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c:5643:1: note: an argument type that has a default promotion can't match an empty parameter name list declaration
{
^
drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c:326:3: note: previous implicit declaration of 'ufshcd_enable_ee' was here
ufshcd_enable_ee(hba, mask);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +/ufshcd_enable_ee +5642 drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
66ec6d59407baf drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c Sujit Reddy Thumma 2013-07-30 5631
66ec6d59407baf drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c Sujit Reddy Thumma 2013-07-30 5632 /**
66ec6d59407baf drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c Sujit Reddy Thumma 2013-07-30 5633 * ufshcd_enable_ee - enable exception event
66ec6d59407baf drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c Sujit Reddy Thumma 2013-07-30 5634 * @hba: per-adapter instance
66ec6d59407baf drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c Sujit Reddy Thumma 2013-07-30 5635 * @mask: exception event to enable
66ec6d59407baf drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c Sujit Reddy Thumma 2013-07-30 5636 *
66ec6d59407baf drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c Sujit Reddy Thumma 2013-07-30 5637 * Enable corresponding exception event in the device to allow
66ec6d59407baf drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c Sujit Reddy Thumma 2013-07-30 5638 * device to alert host in critical scenarios.
66ec6d59407baf drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c Sujit Reddy Thumma 2013-07-30 5639 *
3a17fefe0f1960 drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c Bart Van Assche 2023-07-27 5640 * Return: zero on success, non-zero error value on failure.
66ec6d59407baf drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c Sujit Reddy Thumma 2013-07-30 5641 */
cd4694756188dc drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c Adrian Hunter 2021-02-09 @5642 static inline int ufshcd_enable_ee(struct ufs_hba *hba, u16 mask)
66ec6d59407baf drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c Sujit Reddy Thumma 2013-07-30 5643 {
cd4694756188dc drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c Adrian Hunter 2021-02-09 5644 return ufshcd_update_ee_drv_mask(hba, mask, 0);
66ec6d59407baf drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c Sujit Reddy Thumma 2013-07-30 5645 }
66ec6d59407baf drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c Sujit Reddy Thumma 2013-07-30 5646
diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c index c2df07545f96..f15d14c46789 --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c @@ -306,6 +306,8 @@ static inline void ufshcd_disable_irq(struct ufs_hba *hba) static void ufshcd_configure_wb(struct ufs_hba *hba) { + u16 mask = 0; + if (!ufshcd_is_wb_allowed(hba)) return; @@ -315,6 +317,14 @@ static void ufshcd_configure_wb(struct ufs_hba *hba) if (ufshcd_is_wb_buf_flush_allowed(hba)) ufshcd_wb_toggle_buf_flush(hba, true); + + /* Enable the WRITEBOOSTER_RESIZE_HINT exception mechanism. */ + if (hba->dev_info->wspecversion >= 0x410 + && hba->dev_info->b_presrv_uspc_en + && ufshcd_is_wb_buf_resize_allowed(hba)) { + mask |= MASK_EE_WRITEBOOSTER_RESIZE_HINT; + ufshcd_enable_ee(hba, mask); + } } static void ufshcd_scsi_unblock_requests(struct ufs_hba *hba) @@ -5868,6 +5878,34 @@ static void ufshcd_temp_exception_event_handler(struct ufs_hba *hba, u16 status) */ } +static void ufshcd_wb_resize_exception_event_handler(struct ufs_hba *hba, u16 status) +{ + u32 value; + int err; + + if (!(status | MASK_EE_WRITEBOOSTER_RESIZE_HINT)) + return; + + if (ufshcd_query_attr_retry(hba, UPIU_QUERY_OPCODE_READ_ATTR, + QUERY_ATTR_IDN_WB_BUF_RESIZE_HINT, 0, 0, &value)) + return; + + dev_info(hba->dev, "WB Buffer Resize Hint info %u\n", value); + if (value != 0x01 && value != 0x02) + return; + + if (ufshcd_wait_for_doorbell_clr(hba, 1 * USEC_PER_SEC)) + return; + + err = ufshcd_query_attr_retry(hba, UPIU_QUERY_OPCODE_WRITE_ATTR, + QUERY_ATTR_IDN_WB_BUF_RESIZE_EN, 0, 0, &value); + + if (err) { + dev_err(hba->dev, "Issue %s WB buffer size cmd failed\n", + value == 0x01 ? "Decrease" : "Increase"); + } +} + static int __ufshcd_wb_toggle(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool set, enum flag_idn idn) { u8 index; @@ -6091,6 +6129,9 @@ static void ufshcd_exception_event_handler(struct work_struct *work) if (status & hba->ee_drv_mask & MASK_EE_URGENT_TEMP) ufshcd_temp_exception_event_handler(hba, status); + if (status & hba->ee_drv_mask & MASK_EE_WRITEBOOSTER_RESIZE_HINT) + ufshcd_wb_resize_exception_event_handler(hba, status); + ufs_debugfs_exception_event(hba, status); out: ufshcd_scsi_unblock_requests(hba);
The WRITEBOOSTER_RESIZE_HINT event mechanism is enabled by setting the WRITEBOOSTER_RESIZE_HINT_EN bit of the wExceptionEventControl attribute. The pre-conditions for enabling it include: 1. WB enable 2. Wb is in preserving user space mode 3. UFS version not less than 4.1 4. Host driver allows it to be opened After enabled, when there is a recommendation about resize for the WB Buffer, the device inform the host by the WRITEBOOSTER_RESIZE_HINT exception mechanism. Host driver will call ufshcd_wb_resize_exception_event_handler to handle the exception event. Signed-off-by: Lu Hongfei <luhongfei@vivo.com> --- drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) mode change 100644 => 100755 drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c