| Message ID | 20230904132139.103140-2-benjamin@sipsolutions.net |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [1/2] kunit: add parameter generation macro using description from array | expand |
On Mon, 4 Sept 2023 at 21:22, <benjamin@sipsolutions.net> wrote: > > From: Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@intel.com> > > Add a simple convenience helper to allocate and zero fill an SKB for the > use by a kunit test. Also provide a way to free it again in case that > may be desirable. > > This simply mirrors the kunit_kmalloc API. > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Berg <benjamin.berg@intel.com> > --- This _looks_ pretty good to me, but again, I'd like to see something use it, be it a simple test for these helpers, or a real-world test which takes advantage of them. Particularly since I've not had to use sk_buffs before, personally, so I'd love to see it actually working. Otherwise, this seems okay to me. I'll hold off a final judgement until I've had a chance to actually run it, but I've left a few minor notes (mostly to myself) below. Cheers, -- David > include/kunit/skbuff.h | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 include/kunit/skbuff.h > > diff --git a/include/kunit/skbuff.h b/include/kunit/skbuff.h > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..947fc8b5b48f > --- /dev/null > +++ b/include/kunit/skbuff.h > @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ > +/* > + * Base unit test (KUnit) API. > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2023 Intel Corporation > + */ > + > +#ifndef _KUNIT_SKBUFF_H > +#define _KUNIT_SKBUFF_H Is it worth us hiding this behind #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KUNIT)? I suspect not (we haven't bothered for resource.h, and only really do this for hooks/stubs). > + > +#include <kunit/resource.h> > +#include <linux/skbuff.h> > + > +/** > + * kunit_zalloc_skb() - Allocate and initialize a resource managed skb. > + * @test: The test case to which the skb belongs > + * @len: size to allocate > + * > + * Allocate a new struct sk_buff with GFP_KERNEL, zero fill the give length > + * and add it as a resource to the kunit test for automatic cleanup. > + * > + * Returns: newly allocated SKB, or %NULL on error > + */ > +static inline struct sk_buff *kunit_zalloc_skb(struct kunit *test, int len, > + gfp_t gfp) > +{ > + struct sk_buff *res = alloc_skb(len, GFP_KERNEL); > + > + if (!res || skb_pad(res, len)) > + return NULL;
diff --git a/include/kunit/skbuff.h b/include/kunit/skbuff.h new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..947fc8b5b48f --- /dev/null +++ b/include/kunit/skbuff.h @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@ +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */ +/* + * Base unit test (KUnit) API. + * + * Copyright (C) 2023 Intel Corporation + */ + +#ifndef _KUNIT_SKBUFF_H +#define _KUNIT_SKBUFF_H + +#include <kunit/resource.h> +#include <linux/skbuff.h> + +/** + * kunit_zalloc_skb() - Allocate and initialize a resource managed skb. + * @test: The test case to which the skb belongs + * @len: size to allocate + * + * Allocate a new struct sk_buff with GFP_KERNEL, zero fill the give length + * and add it as a resource to the kunit test for automatic cleanup. + * + * Returns: newly allocated SKB, or %NULL on error + */ +static inline struct sk_buff *kunit_zalloc_skb(struct kunit *test, int len, + gfp_t gfp) +{ + struct sk_buff *res = alloc_skb(len, GFP_KERNEL); + + if (!res || skb_pad(res, len)) + return NULL; + + if (kunit_add_action_or_reset(test, (kunit_action_t *)kfree_skb, res)) + return NULL; + + return res; +} + +/** + * kunit_kfree_skb() - Like kfree_skb except for allocations managed by KUnit. + * @test: The test case to which the resource belongs. + * @skb: The SKB to free. + */ +static inline void kunit_kfree_skb(struct kunit *test, struct sk_buff *skb) +{ + if (!skb) + return; + + kunit_release_action(test, (kunit_action_t *)kfree_skb, (void *)skb); +} + +#endif /* _KUNIT_SKBUFF_H */