@@ -341,6 +341,18 @@ static void damon_test_set_attrs(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_set_attrs(c, &invalid_attrs), -EINVAL);
}
+static void damos_test_new_filter(struct kunit *test)
+{
+ struct damos_filter *filter;
+
+ filter = damos_new_filter(DAMOS_FILTER_TYPE_ANON, true);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, filter->type, DAMOS_FILTER_TYPE_ANON);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, filter->matching, true);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, filter->list.prev, &filter->list);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, filter->list.next, &filter->list);
+ damos_destroy_filter(filter);
+}
+
static struct kunit_case damon_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_target),
KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_regions),
@@ -353,6 +365,7 @@ static struct kunit_case damon_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_set_regions),
KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_update_monitoring_result),
KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_set_attrs),
+ KUNIT_CASE(damos_test_new_filter),
{},
};
damos_new_filter() was having a bug that not initializing ->list field of the returning damos_filter struct, which results in access to uninitialized memory. Add a unit test for the function. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.3.x- Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> --- mm/damon/core-test.h | 13 +++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)