Message ID | 20230712100105.105889-1-brgl@bgdev.pl |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | gpio: sim: fix a typo in comment | expand |
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 12:01:05PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > > It was supposed to say 'for' not 'fo'. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Perhaps you can you run codespell and fix all problematic places at once?
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 5:50 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 12:01:05PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > > > > It was supposed to say 'for' not 'fo'. > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> > > Perhaps you can you run codespell and fix all problematic places at once? > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > > This is the only one reported by codespell. Thanks. Bart
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c index 8b49b0abacd5..cfbdade841e8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-sim.c @@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ struct gpio_sim_device { * This structure however can be modified by callbacks of different * attributes so we need another lock. * - * We use this lock fo protecting all data structures owned by this + * We use this lock for protecting all data structures owned by this * object too. */ struct mutex lock;