diff mbox series

usb: misc: ehset: fix wrong if condition

Message ID 20230705095231.457860-1-xu.yang_2@nxp.com
State New
Headers show
Series usb: misc: ehset: fix wrong if condition | expand

Commit Message

Xu Yang July 5, 2023, 9:52 a.m. UTC
A negative number from ret means the host controller had failed to send
usb message and 0 means succeed. Therefore, the if logic is wrong here
and this patch will fix it.

Fixes: f2b42379c576 ("usb: misc: ehset: Rework test mode entry")
cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/usb/misc/ehset.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Xu Yang July 26, 2023, 1:54 a.m. UTC | #1
> -----Original Message-----
> 
> A negative number from ret means the host controller had failed to send
> usb message and 0 means succeed. Therefore, the if logic is wrong here
> and this patch will fix it.
> 
> Fixes: f2b42379c576 ("usb: misc: ehset: Rework test mode entry")
> cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@nxp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/misc/ehset.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/misc/ehset.c b/drivers/usb/misc/ehset.c
> index 986d6589f053..36b6e9fa7ffb 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/misc/ehset.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/misc/ehset.c
> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static int ehset_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
>  	switch (test_pid) {
>  	case TEST_SE0_NAK_PID:
>  		ret = ehset_prepare_port_for_testing(hub_udev, portnum);
> -		if (!ret)
> +		if (ret < 0)
>  			break;
>  		ret = usb_control_msg_send(hub_udev, 0, USB_REQ_SET_FEATURE,
>  					   USB_RT_PORT, USB_PORT_FEAT_TEST,
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static int ehset_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
>  		break;
>  	case TEST_J_PID:
>  		ret = ehset_prepare_port_for_testing(hub_udev, portnum);
> -		if (!ret)
> +		if (ret < 0)
>  			break;
>  		ret = usb_control_msg_send(hub_udev, 0, USB_REQ_SET_FEATURE,
>  					   USB_RT_PORT, USB_PORT_FEAT_TEST,
> @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static int ehset_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
>  		break;
>  	case TEST_K_PID:
>  		ret = ehset_prepare_port_for_testing(hub_udev, portnum);
> -		if (!ret)
> +		if (ret < 0)
>  			break;
>  		ret = usb_control_msg_send(hub_udev, 0, USB_REQ_SET_FEATURE,
>  					   USB_RT_PORT, USB_PORT_FEAT_TEST,
> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static int ehset_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
>  		break;
>  	case TEST_PACKET_PID:
>  		ret = ehset_prepare_port_for_testing(hub_udev, portnum);
> -		if (!ret)
> +		if (ret < 0)
>  			break;
>  		ret = usb_control_msg_send(hub_udev, 0, USB_REQ_SET_FEATURE,
>  					   USB_RT_PORT, USB_PORT_FEAT_TEST,
> --
> 2.34.1

A gentle ping.
Greg KH July 26, 2023, 3:57 a.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 01:54:15AM +0000, Xu Yang wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > 
> > A negative number from ret means the host controller had failed to send
> > usb message and 0 means succeed. Therefore, the if logic is wrong here
> > and this patch will fix it.
> > 
> > Fixes: f2b42379c576 ("usb: misc: ehset: Rework test mode entry")
> > cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@nxp.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/usb/misc/ehset.c | 8 ++++----
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/misc/ehset.c b/drivers/usb/misc/ehset.c
> > index 986d6589f053..36b6e9fa7ffb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/misc/ehset.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/misc/ehset.c
> > @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static int ehset_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
> >  	switch (test_pid) {
> >  	case TEST_SE0_NAK_PID:
> >  		ret = ehset_prepare_port_for_testing(hub_udev, portnum);
> > -		if (!ret)
> > +		if (ret < 0)
> >  			break;
> >  		ret = usb_control_msg_send(hub_udev, 0, USB_REQ_SET_FEATURE,
> >  					   USB_RT_PORT, USB_PORT_FEAT_TEST,
> > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static int ehset_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
> >  		break;
> >  	case TEST_J_PID:
> >  		ret = ehset_prepare_port_for_testing(hub_udev, portnum);
> > -		if (!ret)
> > +		if (ret < 0)
> >  			break;
> >  		ret = usb_control_msg_send(hub_udev, 0, USB_REQ_SET_FEATURE,
> >  					   USB_RT_PORT, USB_PORT_FEAT_TEST,
> > @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static int ehset_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
> >  		break;
> >  	case TEST_K_PID:
> >  		ret = ehset_prepare_port_for_testing(hub_udev, portnum);
> > -		if (!ret)
> > +		if (ret < 0)
> >  			break;
> >  		ret = usb_control_msg_send(hub_udev, 0, USB_REQ_SET_FEATURE,
> >  					   USB_RT_PORT, USB_PORT_FEAT_TEST,
> > @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static int ehset_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
> >  		break;
> >  	case TEST_PACKET_PID:
> >  		ret = ehset_prepare_port_for_testing(hub_udev, portnum);
> > -		if (!ret)
> > +		if (ret < 0)
> >  			break;
> >  		ret = usb_control_msg_send(hub_udev, 0, USB_REQ_SET_FEATURE,
> >  					   USB_RT_PORT, USB_PORT_FEAT_TEST,
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> 
> A gentle ping.

Have you teted this?  It feels odd that the code could be that broken,
how did it ever work in the first place?

thanks,

greg k-h
Xu Yang July 26, 2023, 5:10 a.m. UTC | #3
Hi Greg,

> On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 01:54:15AM +0000, Xu Yang wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > >
> > > A negative number from ret means the host controller had failed to send
> > > usb message and 0 means succeed. Therefore, the if logic is wrong here
> > > and this patch will fix it.
> > >
> > > Fixes: f2b42379c576 ("usb: misc: ehset: Rework test mode entry")
> > > cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@nxp.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/usb/misc/ehset.c | 8 ++++----
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/misc/ehset.c b/drivers/usb/misc/ehset.c
> > > index 986d6589f053..36b6e9fa7ffb 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/misc/ehset.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/misc/ehset.c
> > > @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ static int ehset_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
> > >     switch (test_pid) {
> > >     case TEST_SE0_NAK_PID:
> > >             ret = ehset_prepare_port_for_testing(hub_udev, portnum);
> > > -           if (!ret)
> > > +           if (ret < 0)
> > >                     break;
> > >             ret = usb_control_msg_send(hub_udev, 0, USB_REQ_SET_FEATURE,
> > >                                        USB_RT_PORT, USB_PORT_FEAT_TEST,
> > > @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static int ehset_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
> > >             break;
> > >     case TEST_J_PID:
> > >             ret = ehset_prepare_port_for_testing(hub_udev, portnum);
> > > -           if (!ret)
> > > +           if (ret < 0)
> > >                     break;
> > >             ret = usb_control_msg_send(hub_udev, 0, USB_REQ_SET_FEATURE,
> > >                                        USB_RT_PORT, USB_PORT_FEAT_TEST,
> > > @@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static int ehset_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
> > >             break;
> > >     case TEST_K_PID:
> > >             ret = ehset_prepare_port_for_testing(hub_udev, portnum);
> > > -           if (!ret)
> > > +           if (ret < 0)
> > >                     break;
> > >             ret = usb_control_msg_send(hub_udev, 0, USB_REQ_SET_FEATURE,
> > >                                        USB_RT_PORT, USB_PORT_FEAT_TEST,
> > > @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static int ehset_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
> > >             break;
> > >     case TEST_PACKET_PID:
> > >             ret = ehset_prepare_port_for_testing(hub_udev, portnum);
> > > -           if (!ret)
> > > +           if (ret < 0)
> > >                     break;
> > >             ret = usb_control_msg_send(hub_udev, 0, USB_REQ_SET_FEATURE,
> > >                                        USB_RT_PORT, USB_PORT_FEAT_TEST,
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
> >
> > A gentle ping.
> 
> Have you teted this?  It feels odd that the code could be that broken,
> how did it ever work in the first place?

Yes, I tested this patch and it works. If without this patch , the driver will skip
sending USB_PORT_FEAT_TEST packet even though USB_PORT_FEAT_SUSPEND
packet is successful. 

You can also check the original handling of TEST_HS_HOST_PORT_SUSPEND_RESUME:

114         case TEST_HS_HOST_PORT_SUSPEND_RESUME:
115                 /* Test: wait for 15secs -> suspend -> 15secs delay -> resume */
116                 msleep(15 * 1000);
117                 ret = usb_control_msg_send(hub_udev, 0, USB_REQ_SET_FEATURE,
118                                            USB_RT_PORT, USB_PORT_FEAT_SUSPEND,
119                                            portnum, NULL, 0, 1000, GFP_KERNEL);
120                 if (ret < 0)
121                         break;

This patch will align to this if condition. I also wonder why no one report this issue.

Thanks,
Xu Yang

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/usb/misc/ehset.c b/drivers/usb/misc/ehset.c
index 986d6589f053..36b6e9fa7ffb 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/misc/ehset.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/misc/ehset.c
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@  static int ehset_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
 	switch (test_pid) {
 	case TEST_SE0_NAK_PID:
 		ret = ehset_prepare_port_for_testing(hub_udev, portnum);
-		if (!ret)
+		if (ret < 0)
 			break;
 		ret = usb_control_msg_send(hub_udev, 0, USB_REQ_SET_FEATURE,
 					   USB_RT_PORT, USB_PORT_FEAT_TEST,
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@  static int ehset_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
 		break;
 	case TEST_J_PID:
 		ret = ehset_prepare_port_for_testing(hub_udev, portnum);
-		if (!ret)
+		if (ret < 0)
 			break;
 		ret = usb_control_msg_send(hub_udev, 0, USB_REQ_SET_FEATURE,
 					   USB_RT_PORT, USB_PORT_FEAT_TEST,
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@  static int ehset_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
 		break;
 	case TEST_K_PID:
 		ret = ehset_prepare_port_for_testing(hub_udev, portnum);
-		if (!ret)
+		if (ret < 0)
 			break;
 		ret = usb_control_msg_send(hub_udev, 0, USB_REQ_SET_FEATURE,
 					   USB_RT_PORT, USB_PORT_FEAT_TEST,
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@  static int ehset_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
 		break;
 	case TEST_PACKET_PID:
 		ret = ehset_prepare_port_for_testing(hub_udev, portnum);
-		if (!ret)
+		if (ret < 0)
 			break;
 		ret = usb_control_msg_send(hub_udev, 0, USB_REQ_SET_FEATURE,
 					   USB_RT_PORT, USB_PORT_FEAT_TEST,