@@ -679,6 +679,24 @@ hsusb_phy1: phy@1613000 {
status = "disabled";
};
+ spmi_bus: spmi@1c40000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic-arb";
+ reg = <0x01c40000 0x1100>,
+ <0x01e00000 0x2000000>,
+ <0x03e00000 0x100000>,
+ <0x03f00000 0xa0000>,
+ <0x01c0a000 0x26000>;
+ reg-names = "core", "chnls", "obsrvr", "intr", "cnfg";
+ interrupt-names = "periph_irq";
+ interrupts = <GIC_SPI 183 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+ qcom,ee = <0>;
+ qcom,channel = <0>;
+ #address-cells = <2>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ interrupt-controller;
+ #interrupt-cells = <4>;
+ };
+
rpm_msg_ram: sram@45f0000 {
compatible = "qcom,rpm-msg-ram";
reg = <0x045f0000 0x7000>;
@@ -1184,27 +1202,9 @@ sram@4690000 {
reg = <0x04690000 0x10000>;
};
- spmi_bus: spmi@1c40000 {
- compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic-arb";
- reg = <0x01c40000 0x1100>,
- <0x01e00000 0x2000000>,
- <0x03e00000 0x100000>,
- <0x03f00000 0xa0000>,
- <0x01c0a000 0x26000>;
- reg-names = "core", "chnls", "obsrvr", "intr", "cnfg";
- interrupt-names = "periph_irq";
- interrupts = <GIC_SPI 183 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
- qcom,ee = <0>;
- qcom,channel = <0>;
- #address-cells = <2>;
- #size-cells = <0>;
- interrupt-controller;
- #interrupt-cells = <4>;
- };
-
apps_smmu: iommu@c600000 {
compatible = "qcom,sm6125-smmu-500", "qcom,smmu-500", "arm,mmu-500";
- reg = <0xc600000 0x80000>;
+ reg = <0x0c600000 0x80000>;
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 81 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
<GIC_SPI 88 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
<GIC_SPI 89 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
This node has always resided in the wrong spot, making it somewhat harder to contribute new node entries while maintaining proper sorting around it. Move the node up to sit after hsusb_phy1 where it maintains proper numerical sorting on the (first of its many) reg address property. Fixes: cff4bbaf2a2d ("arm64: dts: qcom: Add support for SM6125") Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm6125.dtsi | 38 ++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)