@@ -101,21 +101,13 @@ static int __init uniphier_smp_prepare_trampoline(unsigned int max_cpus)
np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "socionext,uniphier-smpctrl");
ret = of_address_to_resource(np, 0, &res);
of_node_put(np);
- if (!ret) {
- rom_rsv2_phys = res.start + UNIPHIER_SMPCTRL_ROM_RSV2;
- } else {
- /* try old binding too */
- np = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL,
- "socionext,uniphier-system-bus-controller");
- ret = of_address_to_resource(np, 1, &res);
- of_node_put(np);
- if (ret) {
- pr_err("failed to get resource of SMP control\n");
- return ret;
- }
- rom_rsv2_phys = res.start + 0x1000 + UNIPHIER_SMPCTRL_ROM_RSV2;
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err("failed to get resource of SMP control\n");
+ return ret;
}
+ rom_rsv2_phys = res.start + UNIPHIER_SMPCTRL_ROM_RSV2;
+
ret = uniphier_smp_copy_trampoline(rom_rsv2_phys);
if (ret)
return ret;
Commit 307d40c56b0c ("ARM: uniphier: rework SMP code to support new System Bus binding") added a new DT binding for SMP code, but still kept old code for the backward compatibility. Linux 4.6 was out with both bindings supported, so it should not hurt to drop the old code now. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> --- arch/arm/mach-uniphier/platsmp.c | 18 +++++------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) -- 1.9.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel