@@ -2189,9 +2189,9 @@ lpfc_debugfs_lockstat_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
#endif
static int lpfc_debugfs_ras_log_data(struct lpfc_hba *phba,
- char *buffer, int size)
+ char *buffer, size_t size)
{
- int copied = 0;
+ size_t copied = 0;
struct lpfc_dmabuf *dmabuf, *next;
memset(buffer, 0, size);
@@ -2249,7 +2249,7 @@ lpfc_debugfs_ras_log_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
struct lpfc_hba *phba = inode->i_private;
struct lpfc_debug *debug;
- int size;
+ size_t size;
int rc = -ENOMEM;
spin_lock_irq(&phba->hbalock);
Avoid confusing the compiler about possible negative sizes. Use size_t instead of int for variables size and copied. Address the following warning found with GCC-13: In function ‘lpfc_debugfs_ras_log_data’, inlined from ‘lpfc_debugfs_ras_log_open’ at drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:2271:15: drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c:2210:25: warning: ‘memcpy’ specified bound between 18446744071562067968 and 18446744073709551615 exceeds maximum object size 9223372036854775807 [-Wstringop-overflow=] 2210 | memcpy(buffer + copied, dmabuf->virt, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2211 | size - copied - 1); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/305 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> --- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_debugfs.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)