diff mbox series

[1/8] net/mlx5: Update the driver with the recent thermal changes

Message ID 20230525140135.3589917-2-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
State Accepted
Commit a5639fade0cfe5a45584f2770811034dab43baaa
Headers show
Series Finish thermal zone structure encapsulation | expand

Commit Message

Daniel Lezcano May 25, 2023, 2:01 p.m. UTC
The thermal framework is migrating to the generic trip points. The set
of changes also implies a self-encapsulation of the thermal zone
device structure where the internals are no longer directly accessible
but with accessors.

Use the new API instead, so the next changes can be pushed in the
thermal framework without this driver failing to compile.

No functional changes intended.

Cc: Sandipan Patra <spatra@nvidia.com>
Cc: Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/thermal.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Comments

Saeed Mahameed May 31, 2023, 10:10 p.m. UTC | #1
On 25 May 16:01, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>The thermal framework is migrating to the generic trip points. The set
>of changes also implies a self-encapsulation of the thermal zone
>device structure where the internals are no longer directly accessible
>but with accessors.
>
>Use the new API instead, so the next changes can be pushed in the
>thermal framework without this driver failing to compile.
>
>No functional changes intended.
>

I see this patch is part of a large series, do you expect me to re-post to
net-next or you are going to submit via another tree ?
Daniel Lezcano June 7, 2023, 1:17 p.m. UTC | #2
On 01/06/2023 00:10, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> On 25 May 16:01, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> The thermal framework is migrating to the generic trip points. The set
>> of changes also implies a self-encapsulation of the thermal zone
>> device structure where the internals are no longer directly accessible
>> but with accessors.
>>
>> Use the new API instead, so the next changes can be pushed in the
>> thermal framework without this driver failing to compile.
>>
>> No functional changes intended.
>>
> 
> I see this patch is part of a large series, do you expect me to re-post to
> net-next or you are going to submit via another tree ?

Sorry for the delay.

Yes, this patch is targeted for the thermal tree. The last patch of the 
series depends on it as it moves the thermal zone device structure to 
the private thermal header, thus the structure internals won't be 
accessible from this driver anymore.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/thermal.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/thermal.c
index e47fa6fb836f..20bb5eb266c1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/thermal.c
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@  static int mlx5_thermal_get_mtmp_temp(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev, u32 id, int *p
 static int mlx5_thermal_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tzdev,
 				 int *p_temp)
 {
-	struct mlx5_thermal *thermal = tzdev->devdata;
+	struct mlx5_thermal *thermal = thermal_zone_device_priv(tzdev);
 	struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev = thermal->mdev;
 	int err;
 
@@ -81,12 +81,13 @@  int mlx5_thermal_init(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	thermal->mdev = mdev;
-	thermal->tzdev = thermal_zone_device_register(data,
-						      MLX5_THERMAL_NUM_TRIPS,
-						      MLX5_THERMAL_TRIP_MASK,
-						      thermal,
-						      &mlx5_thermal_ops,
-						      NULL, 0, MLX5_THERMAL_POLL_INT_MSEC);
+	thermal->tzdev = thermal_zone_device_register_with_trips(data,
+								 NULL,
+								 MLX5_THERMAL_NUM_TRIPS,
+								 MLX5_THERMAL_TRIP_MASK,
+								 thermal,
+								 &mlx5_thermal_ops,
+								 NULL, 0, MLX5_THERMAL_POLL_INT_MSEC);
 	if (IS_ERR(thermal->tzdev)) {
 		dev_err(mdev->device, "Failed to register thermal zone device (%s) %ld\n",
 			data, PTR_ERR(thermal->tzdev));