Message ID | 20230411-dpu-intf-te-v2-1-ef76c877eb97@somainline.org |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | drm/msm/dpu: Implement tearcheck support on INTF block | expand |
On 4/17/2023 1:21 PM, Marijn Suijten wrote: > Neither of these SoCs has INTF0, they only have a DSI interface on index > 1. Stop enabling an interrupt that can't fire. > > Fixes: 3581b7062cec ("drm/msm/disp/dpu1: add support for display on SM6115") > Fixes: 5334087ee743 ("drm/msm: add support for QCM2290 MDSS") > Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org> > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> > Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> > --- Yes, this is right, Both of these chipsets only have DSI on index 1. Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_6_3_sm6115.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_6_3_sm6115.h index 6f04d8f85c92..988d820f7ef2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_6_3_sm6115.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_6_3_sm6115.h @@ -122,7 +122,6 @@ const struct dpu_mdss_cfg dpu_sm6115_cfg = { .mdss_irqs = BIT(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR) | \ BIT(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR2) | \ BIT(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_HIST_INTR) | \ - BIT(MDP_INTF0_INTR) | \ BIT(MDP_INTF1_INTR), }; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_6_5_qcm2290.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_6_5_qcm2290.h index 303492d62a5c..c9003dcc1a59 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_6_5_qcm2290.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/catalog/dpu_6_5_qcm2290.h @@ -112,7 +112,6 @@ const struct dpu_mdss_cfg dpu_qcm2290_cfg = { .mdss_irqs = BIT(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR) | \ BIT(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_INTR2) | \ BIT(MDP_SSPP_TOP0_HIST_INTR) | \ - BIT(MDP_INTF0_INTR) | \ BIT(MDP_INTF1_INTR), };