@@ -890,7 +890,7 @@ static int bcm_resume(struct device *dev)
#endif
/* Some firmware reports an IRQ which does not work (wrong pin in fw table?) */
-static struct gpiod_lookup_table asus_tf103c_irq_gpios = {
+static struct gpiod_lookup_table irq_on_int33fc02_pin17_gpios = {
.dev_id = "serial0-0",
.table = {
GPIO_LOOKUP("INT33FC:02", 17, "host-wakeup-alt", GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH),
@@ -905,7 +905,18 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id bcm_broken_irq_dmi_table[] = {
DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC."),
DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "TF103C"),
},
- .driver_data = &asus_tf103c_irq_gpios,
+ .driver_data = &irq_on_int33fc02_pin17_gpios,
+ },
+ {
+ .ident = "Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 830F/L / 1050F/L",
+ .matches = {
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Intel Corp."),
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "VALLEYVIEW C0 PLATFORM"),
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "BYT-T FFD8"),
+ /* Partial match on beginning of BIOS version */
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_VERSION, "BLADE_21"),
+ },
+ .driver_data = &irq_on_int33fc02_pin17_gpios,
},
{
.ident = "Meegopad T08",
The DSDT for the Lenovo Yoga Tablet 2 830 / 1050 models (which share the same mainboard) specifies a IOAPIC IRQ for the HCI -> host IRQ but this is not correct. Like the Asus TF103C these tablets use pin 17 of the INT33FC:02 GPIO controller for the IRQ and this pin is _not_ configured in direct IRQ mode by the firmware. Add a DMI match for this, re-using the Asus TF103C gpiod_lookup_table, to fix bluetooth not working on these tablets. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> --- drivers/bluetooth/hci_bcm.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)