Message ID | 20230329180502.1884307-5-kal.conley@dectris.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | [bpf-next,v2,01/10] selftests: xsk: Add xskxceiver.h dependency to Makefile | expand |
On Wed, 29 Mar 2023 at 20:11, Kal Conley <kal.conley@dectris.com> wrote: > > Fix flaky STATS_RX_DROPPED test. The receiver calls getsockopt after > receiving the last (valid) packet which is not the final packet sent in > the test (valid and invalid packets are sent in alternating fashion with > the final packet being invalid). Since the last packet may or may not > have been dropped already, both outcomes must be allowed. > > This issue could also be fixed by making sure the last packet sent is > valid. This alternative is left as an exercise to the reader (or the > benevolent maintainers of this file). > > This problem was quite visible on certain setups. On one machine this > failure was observed 50% of the time. > > Also, remove a redundant assignment of pkt_stream->nb_pkts. This field > is already initialized by __pkt_stream_alloc. This has been bugging me for a while so thanks for fixing this. Please break this commit out of this patch set and send it as a separate bug fix. Acked-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com> > Fixes: 27e934bec35b ("selftests: xsk: make stat tests not spin on getsockopt") > Signed-off-by: Kal Conley <kal.conley@dectris.com> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c | 10 ++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c > index 34a1f32fe752..1a4bdd5aa78c 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c > @@ -633,7 +633,6 @@ static struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream_generate(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, u32 nb > if (!pkt_stream) > exit_with_error(ENOMEM); > > - pkt_stream->nb_pkts = nb_pkts; > for (i = 0; i < nb_pkts; i++) { > pkt_set(umem, &pkt_stream->pkts[i], (i % umem->num_frames) * umem->frame_size, > pkt_len); > @@ -1141,7 +1140,14 @@ static int validate_rx_dropped(struct ifobject *ifobject) > if (err) > return TEST_FAILURE; > > - if (stats.rx_dropped == ifobject->pkt_stream->nb_pkts / 2) > + /* The receiver calls getsockopt after receiving the last (valid) > + * packet which is not the final packet sent in this test (valid and > + * invalid packets are sent in alternating fashion with the final > + * packet being invalid). Since the last packet may or may not have > + * been dropped already, both outcomes must be allowed. > + */ > + if (stats.rx_dropped == ifobject->pkt_stream->nb_pkts / 2 || > + stats.rx_dropped == ifobject->pkt_stream->nb_pkts / 2 - 1) > return TEST_PASS; > > return TEST_FAILURE; > -- > 2.39.2 >
> > Can I send patches 01-05 all together as one patchset? > On second thought, I will just send out 01, 04, and 05 already separately since those are all completely independent.
> #2 is also a bug fix in my mind, but not #3 as it just adds a test. > #2 is a bugfix, but if we put this on the "bpf" tree already, then it will make a problem for later commits that depend on it which would go on bpf-next.
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c index 34a1f32fe752..1a4bdd5aa78c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c @@ -633,7 +633,6 @@ static struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream_generate(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, u32 nb if (!pkt_stream) exit_with_error(ENOMEM); - pkt_stream->nb_pkts = nb_pkts; for (i = 0; i < nb_pkts; i++) { pkt_set(umem, &pkt_stream->pkts[i], (i % umem->num_frames) * umem->frame_size, pkt_len); @@ -1141,7 +1140,14 @@ static int validate_rx_dropped(struct ifobject *ifobject) if (err) return TEST_FAILURE; - if (stats.rx_dropped == ifobject->pkt_stream->nb_pkts / 2) + /* The receiver calls getsockopt after receiving the last (valid) + * packet which is not the final packet sent in this test (valid and + * invalid packets are sent in alternating fashion with the final + * packet being invalid). Since the last packet may or may not have + * been dropped already, both outcomes must be allowed. + */ + if (stats.rx_dropped == ifobject->pkt_stream->nb_pkts / 2 || + stats.rx_dropped == ifobject->pkt_stream->nb_pkts / 2 - 1) return TEST_PASS; return TEST_FAILURE;
Fix flaky STATS_RX_DROPPED test. The receiver calls getsockopt after receiving the last (valid) packet which is not the final packet sent in the test (valid and invalid packets are sent in alternating fashion with the final packet being invalid). Since the last packet may or may not have been dropped already, both outcomes must be allowed. This issue could also be fixed by making sure the last packet sent is valid. This alternative is left as an exercise to the reader (or the benevolent maintainers of this file). This problem was quite visible on certain setups. On one machine this failure was observed 50% of the time. Also, remove a redundant assignment of pkt_stream->nb_pkts. This field is already initialized by __pkt_stream_alloc. Fixes: 27e934bec35b ("selftests: xsk: make stat tests not spin on getsockopt") Signed-off-by: Kal Conley <kal.conley@dectris.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)