Message ID | 20230314080443.64635-6-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | [v8,01/14] dt-bindings: arm: msm: Update the maintainers for LLCC | expand |
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi index bdcb74925313..afe74db1f5ae 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi @@ -3582,8 +3582,9 @@ gem_noc: interconnect@9100000 { system-cache-controller@9200000 { compatible = "qcom,sc7280-llcc"; - reg = <0 0x09200000 0 0xd0000>, <0 0x09600000 0 0x50000>; - reg-names = "llcc_base", "llcc_broadcast_base"; + reg = <0 0x09200000 0 0x58000>, <0 0x09280000 0 0x58000>, + <0 0x09600000 0 0x58000>; + reg-names = "llcc0_base", "llcc1_base", "llcc_broadcast_base"; interrupts = <GIC_SPI 582 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; };
The LLCC block has several banks each with a different base address and holes in between. So it is not a correct approach to cover these banks with a single offset/size. Instead, the individual bank's base address needs to be specified in devicetree with the exact size. While at it, let's also fix the size of the llcc_broadcast_base to cover the whole region. Reported-by: Parikshit Pareek <quic_ppareek@quicinc.com> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)