Message ID | ZAYCRPsKR8Je6LOW@black.fi.intel.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [GIT,PULL] intel-gpio for 6.3-1 | expand |
On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 4:14 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > Hi Linux GPIO maintainers et al., > > Combined series to clean up headers in the GPIO library and drivers. > Along with it, drop a few unused legacy APIs. > > This tag is immutable, enjoy! Thanks for coordinating and getting this sorted and tested Andy, perfect job as always! > intel-gpio for v6.3-1 But I think you mean it for v6.4? Yours, Linus Walleij
On Mon, Mar 6, 2023, at 23:35, andy.shevchenko@gmail.com wrote: > Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 10:50:40PM +0100, Linus Walleij kirjoitti: >> On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 4:14 PM Andy Shevchenko >> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> >> > Hi Linux GPIO maintainers et al., >> > >> > Combined series to clean up headers in the GPIO library and drivers. >> > Along with it, drop a few unused legacy APIs. >> > >> > This tag is immutable, enjoy! >> >> Thanks for coordinating and getting this sorted and tested Andy, perfect >> job as always! > > You're welcome! > >> > intel-gpio for v6.3-1 >> >> But I think you mean it for v6.4? > > Well, techically speaking it didn't make v6.3-rc1 due to cross-dependencies. > Starting from it it may be applied to v6.3 or to v6.4. > > Up to you and Bart, but I prefer not to rebrand the tag, if it's an option. I think it was clear that this would not make it into 6.3 after the decision to rebase on top of 6.3-rc1. However, the tag name and description both look like they make sense for 6.4 the way you wrote them. Arnd
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 10:09 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 6, 2023, at 23:35, andy.shevchenko@gmail.com wrote: > > Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 10:50:40PM +0100, Linus Walleij kirjoitti: > >> On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 4:14 PM Andy Shevchenko > >> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi Linux GPIO maintainers et al., > >> > > >> > Combined series to clean up headers in the GPIO library and drivers. > >> > Along with it, drop a few unused legacy APIs. > >> > > >> > This tag is immutable, enjoy! > >> > >> Thanks for coordinating and getting this sorted and tested Andy, perfect > >> job as always! > > > > You're welcome! > > > >> > intel-gpio for v6.3-1 > >> > >> But I think you mean it for v6.4? > > > > Well, techically speaking it didn't make v6.3-rc1 due to cross-dependencies. > > Starting from it it may be applied to v6.3 or to v6.4. > > > > Up to you and Bart, but I prefer not to rebrand the tag, if it's an option. > > I think it was clear that this would not make it into 6.3 after > the decision to rebase on top of 6.3-rc1. However, the tag name > and description both look like they make sense for 6.4 the way > you wrote them. Okay, I will rre-tag this.
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 12:42 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 11:51:44AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 10:09 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 6, 2023, at 23:35, andy.shevchenko@gmail.com wrote: > > > > Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 10:50:40PM +0100, Linus Walleij kirjoitti: > > > >> On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 4:14 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > >> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Hi Linux GPIO maintainers et al., > > > >> > > > > >> > Combined series to clean up headers in the GPIO library and drivers. > > > >> > Along with it, drop a few unused legacy APIs. > > > >> > > > > >> > This tag is immutable, enjoy! > > > >> > > > >> Thanks for coordinating and getting this sorted and tested Andy, perfect > > > >> job as always! > > > > > > > > You're welcome! > > > > > > > >> > intel-gpio for v6.3-1 > > > >> > > > >> But I think you mean it for v6.4? > > > > > > > > Well, techically speaking it didn't make v6.3-rc1 due to cross-dependencies. > > > > Starting from it it may be applied to v6.3 or to v6.4. > > > > > > > > Up to you and Bart, but I prefer not to rebrand the tag, if it's an option. > > > > > > I think it was clear that this would not make it into 6.3 after > > > the decision to rebase on top of 6.3-rc1. However, the tag name > > > and description both look like they make sense for 6.4 the way > > > you wrote them. > > > > Okay, I will rre-tag this. > > Now it's tagged as intel-gpio-v6.4-1. Should I send a new PR? > Yes, please. Bart