diff mbox

[v14,3/4] ARM64: add SBSA Generic Watchdog device node in amd-seattle-soc.dtsi

Message ID 1456735610-22012-4-git-send-email-fu.wei@linaro.org
State Accepted
Commit 1615ae896ed94d0a0e3b2ec56369ad86a3f1892f
Headers show

Commit Message

Fu Wei Fu Feb. 29, 2016, 8:46 a.m. UTC
From: Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org>


This can be a example of adding SBSA Generic Watchdog device node
into some dts files for the Soc which contains SBSA Generic Watchdog.

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>

Signed-off-by: Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org>

Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

-- 
2.5.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Comments

Fu Wei Fu March 28, 2016, 1:12 p.m. UTC | #1
Hi Wim, Guenter:

Great thanks for reviewing and applying this patchset :-)
Now I can see almost all the patches of this patchset have been merged
into the master branch of mainline kernel.
But only this one is still out of any branch or repo. It seems that
it's applied on linux-watchdog for a while, then disappeared.


So any thing I can do for this patch? Do I need to resubmit it?
Maybe I miss it in some repo? Could you help me ?
Great thanks ! :-)

On 29 February 2016 at 16:46,  <fu.wei@linaro.org> wrote:
> From: Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org>

>

> This can be a example of adding SBSA Generic Watchdog device node

> into some dts files for the Soc which contains SBSA Generic Watchdog.

>

> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>

> Signed-off-by: Fu Wei <fu.wei@linaro.org>

> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

> ---

>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi | 8 ++++++++

>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

>

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi

> index 2874d92..0a8ca1d 100644

> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi

> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi

> @@ -84,6 +84,14 @@

>                         clock-names = "uartclk", "apb_pclk";

>                 };

>

> +               watchdog0: watchdog@e0bb0000 {

> +                       compatible = "arm,sbsa-gwdt";

> +                       reg = <0x0 0xe0bc0000 0 0x1000>,

> +                               <0x0 0xe0bb0000 0 0x1000>;

> +                       interrupts = <0 337 4>;

> +                       timeout-sec = <15>;

> +               };

> +

>                 spi0: ssp@e1020000 {

>                         status = "disabled";

>                         compatible = "arm,pl022", "arm,primecell";

> --

> 2.5.0

>




-- 
Best regards,

Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat Software (Beijing) Co.,Ltd.Shanghai Branch
Ph: +86 21 61221326(direct)
Ph: +86 186 2020 4684 (mobile)
Room 1512, Regus One Corporate Avenue,Level 15,
One Corporate Avenue,222 Hubin Road,Huangpu District,
Shanghai,China 200021
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Fu Wei Fu March 28, 2016, 5:16 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Pratyush, Guenter,

On 28 March 2016 at 22:11, Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 28/03/2016:06:46:20 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote:

>> On 03/28/2016 06:12 AM, Fu Wei wrote:

>> >Hi Wim, Guenter:

>> >

>> >Great thanks for reviewing and applying this patchset :-)

>> >Now I can see almost all the patches of this patchset have been merged

>> >into the master branch of mainline kernel.

>> >But only this one is still out of any branch or repo. It seems that

>> >it's applied on linux-watchdog for a while, then disappeared.

>> >

>> >

>> >So any thing I can do for this patch? Do I need to resubmit it?

>> >Maybe I miss it in some repo? Could you help me ?

>> >Great thanks ! :-)

>> >

>>

>> If I recall correctly, it was supposed to go in through some other tree (arm-soc ?)

>

> Yes, it should have gone through arm-soc tree. But, it seems it got missed.  The

> other dt patch for foundation-v8 is there in v4.6 pull request

> [https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/20/244].


Yes, I thought it should be in arm-soc, but I have checked several
branches in arm-soc repo, I can't find this patch.
So can someone help to apply it.  I have applied it on the master
branch of latest mainline kernel locally, I don't see any conflict.

Great thanks :-)

>

> ~Pratyush




-- 
Best regards,

Fu Wei
Software Engineer
Red Hat Software (Beijing) Co.,Ltd.Shanghai Branch
Ph: +86 21 61221326(direct)
Ph: +86 186 2020 4684 (mobile)
Room 1512, Regus One Corporate Avenue,Level 15,
One Corporate Avenue,222 Hubin Road,Huangpu District,
Shanghai,China 200021
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-watchdog" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi
index 2874d92..0a8ca1d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi
@@ -84,6 +84,14 @@ 
 			clock-names = "uartclk", "apb_pclk";
 		};
 
+		watchdog0: watchdog@e0bb0000 {
+			compatible = "arm,sbsa-gwdt";
+			reg = <0x0 0xe0bc0000 0 0x1000>,
+				<0x0 0xe0bb0000 0 0x1000>;
+			interrupts = <0 337 4>;
+			timeout-sec = <15>;
+		};
+
 		spi0: ssp@e1020000 {
 			status = "disabled";
 			compatible = "arm,pl022", "arm,primecell";