@@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ struct property_entry {
__PROPERTY_ENTRY_ARRAY_LEN(_name_, u64_data, U64, _val_, _len_)
#define PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING_ARRAY_LEN(_name_, _val_, _len_) \
__PROPERTY_ENTRY_ARRAY_LEN(_name_, str, STRING, _val_, _len_)
+
#define PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF_ARRAY_LEN(_name_, _val_, _len_) \
(struct property_entry) { \
.name = _name_, \
@@ -371,12 +372,6 @@ struct property_entry {
#define PROPERTY_ENTRY_STRING(_name_, _val_) \
__PROPERTY_ENTRY_ELEMENT(_name_, str, STRING, _val_)
-#define PROPERTY_ENTRY_BOOL(_name_) \
-(struct property_entry) { \
- .name = _name_, \
- .is_inline = true, \
-}
-
#define PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF(_name_, _ref_, ...) \
(struct property_entry) { \
.name = _name_, \
@@ -385,9 +380,14 @@ struct property_entry {
{ .pointer = &SOFTWARE_NODE_REFERENCE(_ref_, ##__VA_ARGS__), }, \
}
+#define PROPERTY_ENTRY_BOOL(_name_) \
+(struct property_entry) { \
+ .name = _name_, \
+ .is_inline = true, \
+}
+
struct property_entry *
property_entries_dup(const struct property_entry *properties);
-
void property_entries_free(const struct property_entry *properties);
bool device_dma_supported(const struct device *dev);
Let's order ARRAY and non-ARRAY macros in the same way. The PROPERTY_ENTRY_BOOL() is special, move it a bit down in the code so it won't break ordering of the rest. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> --- v3: no changes v2: rebased on latest Linux Next include/linux/property.h | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)