[01/23] dt-bindings: display: tegra: add bindings for Tegra20 VIP

From: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>

VIP is the parallel video capture component within the video input
subsystem of Tegra20 (and other Tegra chips, apparently).

Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
---
 .../display/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-vip.yaml     | 64 +++++++++++++++++++
 MAINTAINERS                                   |  7 ++
 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-vip.yaml

Hello Krzysztof,

thanks for the review. I'm glad my error rate on bindings is lower than
it used to be before I attended your ELCE talk! ;)

On Tue, 15 Nov 2022 13:12:44 +0100
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> wrote:

> On 09/11/2022 15:18, luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com wrote:
> > From: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
> > 
> > VIP is the parallel video capture component within the video input
> > subsystem of Tegra20 (and other Tegra chips, apparently).  
> 
> Subject: drop second, redundant "bindings".
> 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
> > ---
> >  .../display/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-vip.yaml     | 64 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  MAINTAINERS                                   |  7 ++
> >  2 files changed, 71 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-vip.yaml
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-vip.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-vip.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..934dabfd2307
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-vip.yaml
> > @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
> > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +%YAML 1.2
> > +---
> > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/tegra/nvidia,tegra20-vip.yaml#
> > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > +
> > +title: NVIDIA Tegra VIP (parallel video capture) controller
> > +
> > +maintainers:
> > +  - Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
> > +
> > +properties:
> > +  $nodename:
> > +    const: vip  
> 
> No need to enforce names in device schemas, especially that this does
> not look like a generic name.
> 
> > +
> > +  compatible:
> > +    enum:
> > +      - nvidia,tegra20-vip
> > +
> > +  "#address-cells":
> > +    const: 1
> > +
> > +  "#size-cells":
> > +    const: 0
> > +
> > +  channel@0:  
> 
> Missing description.

OK, I think this should do:

  description: parallel video capture interface for the VI

> > +    type: object  
> 
> Do you expect it to grow to more channels?

Not on Tegra20, it has one input only, but for other SoCs it's likely.
Definitely some (including Tegra20 itself) have multiple CSI-2 inputs,
and it's reasonable that this can apply to parallel input too.

Is this enough motivation to make room for more channels, or should I
remove it since I have no plans to introduce support for other Tegra
chips?

> > +
> > +    properties:
> > +      reg: true  
> 
> const: 0
> 
> > +
> > +      ports:
> > +        $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports
> > +
> > +        properties:
> > +          port@0:
> > +            $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
> > +            description:
> > +              Port receiving the video stream from the sensor
> > +
> > +          port@1:
> > +            $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
> > +            description:
> > +              Port sending the video stream to the VI
> > +
> > +        required:
> > +          - port@0
> > +          - port@1
> > +
> > +    additionalProperties: false
> > +
> > +    required:
> > +      - reg
> > +      - ports
> > +
> > +unevaluatedProperties: false
> > +
> > +required:
> > +  - compatible
> > +  - "#address-cells"
> > +  - "#size-cells"
> > +  - channel@0
> > +
> > +# see nvidia,tegra20-vi.yaml for an example  
> 
> That file does not have this compatible. At least not on next-20221109.

It's added in patch 2. It's a chicken-egg problem, should I add a third
patch that adds this line only?

ACK for all other comments you wrote.

On 18/11/2022 10:08, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
>   description: parallel video capture interface for the VI
> 
>>> +    type: object  
>>
>> Do you expect it to grow to more channels?
> 
> Not on Tegra20, it has one input only, but for other SoCs it's likely.
> Definitely some (including Tegra20 itself) have multiple CSI-2 inputs,
> and it's reasonable that this can apply to parallel input too.
> 
> Is this enough motivation to make room for more channels, or should I
> remove it since I have no plans to introduce support for other Tegra
> chips?

The best would be to add some more Tegra SoCs here, so that this @0
makes sense.

But I guess the block can be re-used in future, so it could also stay
like this.

> 
>>> +
>>> +    properties:
>>> +      reg: true  
>>
>> const: 0
>>
>>> +
>>> +      ports:
>>> +        $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports
>>> +
>>> +        properties:
>>> +          port@0:
>>> +            $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
>>> +            description:
>>> +              Port receiving the video stream from the sensor
>>> +
>>> +          port@1:
>>> +            $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
>>> +            description:
>>> +              Port sending the video stream to the VI
>>> +
>>> +        required:
>>> +          - port@0
>>> +          - port@1
>>> +
>>> +    additionalProperties: false
>>> +
>>> +    required:
>>> +      - reg
>>> +      - ports
>>> +
>>> +unevaluatedProperties: false
>>> +
>>> +required:
>>> +  - compatible
>>> +  - "#address-cells"
>>> +  - "#size-cells"
>>> +  - channel@0
>>> +
>>> +# see nvidia,tegra20-vi.yaml for an example  
>>
>> That file does not have this compatible. At least not on next-20221109.
> 
> It's added in patch 2. It's a chicken-egg problem, should I add a third
> patch that adds this line only?
> 
> ACK for all other comments you wrote.

It's ok.

Best regards,
Krzysztof