@@ -108,8 +108,8 @@ void bpf__clear(void)
}
static void
-bpf_prog_priv__clear(struct bpf_program *prog __maybe_unused,
- void *_priv)
+clear_prog_priv(struct bpf_program *prog __maybe_unused,
+ void *_priv)
{
struct bpf_prog_priv *priv = _priv;
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @@ config_bpf_program(struct bpf_program *prog)
}
pr_debug("bpf: config '%s' is ok\n", config_str);
- err = bpf_program__set_private(prog, priv, bpf_prog_priv__clear);
+ err = bpf_program__set_private(prog, priv, clear_prog_priv);
if (err) {
pr_debug("Failed to set priv for program '%s'\n", config_str);
goto errout;
The name of bpf_prog_priv__clear() doesn't follow perf's naming convention. bpf_prog_priv__delete() seems to be a better name. However, bpf_prog_priv__delete() should be a method of 'struct bpf_prog_priv', but its first parameter is 'struct bpf_program'. It is callback from libbpf to clear priv structures when destroying a bpf program. It is actually a method of bpf_program (libbpf object), but bpf_program__ functions should be provided by libbpf. This patch removes the prefix of that function. Signed-off-by: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Cc: He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com> Cc: pi3orama@163.com --- tools/perf/util/bpf-loader.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- 1.8.3.4