diff mbox

[V4,2/7] cpufreq: Call __cpufreq_governor() with policy->rwsem held

Message ID 2d9def751daa27c9aba57ab29a54003dd279e5e7.1454988792.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org
State New
Headers show

Commit Message

Viresh Kumar Feb. 9, 2016, 3:46 a.m. UTC 
This isn't followed properly by all parts of the core code, some follow
it, whereas others don't.

Enforcing it will also enable us to remove cpufreq_governor_lock, that
is used today because we can't guarantee that __cpufreq_governor() isn't
executed in parallel.

We should also ensure that the lock is held across state changes to the
governors.

For example, while adding a CPU to the policy on cpu-online path, we
need to stop the governor, change policy->cpus, start the governor and
then refresh its limits. The complete sequence must be guaranteed to
execute without any concurrent races. And that can be achieved using
policy->rwsem around these use cases.

Also note that cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu() and ->exit() can get called
while policy->rwsem is held. That shouldn't have any side effects
though.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>

Tested-by: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

-- 
2.7.1.370.gb2aa7f8

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Comments

Viresh Kumar Feb. 11, 2016, 11:52 a.m. UTC | #1 
On 11-02-16, 10:48, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 4:46 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:

> > Also note that cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu() and ->exit() can get called

> > while policy->rwsem is held. That shouldn't have any side effects

> > though.

> 

> The last paragraph is unclear.

> 

> Is it supposed to mean that the change will cause

> cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu() and ->exit() to be called under

> policy->rwsem sometimes?


Yeah, reworded it a bit ..

Also note that, after this patch cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu() and ->exit()
will get called while policy->rwsem is held, which wasn't the case
earlier. That shouldn't have any side effects though.

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 863ac26c4ecf..51fb47cd38a0 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1048,30 +1048,29 @@  static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cp
 	if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus))
 		return 0;
 
+	down_write(&policy->rwsem);
 	if (has_target()) {
 		ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
 		if (ret) {
 			pr_err("%s: Failed to stop governor\n", __func__);
-			return ret;
+			goto unlock;
 		}
 	}
 
-	down_write(&policy->rwsem);
 	cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus);
-	up_write(&policy->rwsem);
 
 	if (has_target()) {
 		ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
 		if (!ret)
 			ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
 
-		if (ret) {
+		if (ret)
 			pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor\n", __func__);
-			return ret;
-		}
 	}
 
-	return 0;
+unlock:
+	up_write(&policy->rwsem);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(unsigned int cpu)
@@ -1374,13 +1373,13 @@  static void cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
 		return;
 	}
 
+	down_write(&policy->rwsem);
 	if (has_target()) {
 		ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
 		if (ret)
 			pr_err("%s: Failed to stop governor\n", __func__);
 	}
 
-	down_write(&policy->rwsem);
 	cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus);
 
 	if (policy_is_inactive(policy)) {
@@ -1393,7 +1392,6 @@  static void cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
 		/* Nominate new CPU */
 		policy->cpu = cpumask_any(policy->cpus);
 	}
-	up_write(&policy->rwsem);
 
 	/* Start governor again for active policy */
 	if (!policy_is_inactive(policy)) {
@@ -1406,7 +1404,7 @@  static void cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
 				pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor\n", __func__);
 		}
 
-		return;
+		goto unlock;
 	}
 
 	if (cpufreq_driver->stop_cpu)
@@ -1428,6 +1426,9 @@  static void cpufreq_offline(unsigned int cpu)
 		cpufreq_driver->exit(policy);
 		policy->freq_table = NULL;
 	}
+
+unlock:
+	up_write(&policy->rwsem);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1624,6 +1625,7 @@  EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_generic_suspend);
 void cpufreq_suspend(void)
 {
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (!cpufreq_driver)
 		return;
@@ -1634,7 +1636,11 @@  void cpufreq_suspend(void)
 	pr_debug("%s: Suspending Governors\n", __func__);
 
 	for_each_active_policy(policy) {
-		if (__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP))
+		down_write(&policy->rwsem);
+		ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
+		up_write(&policy->rwsem);
+
+		if (ret)
 			pr_err("%s: Failed to stop governor for policy: %p\n",
 				__func__, policy);
 		else if (cpufreq_driver->suspend
@@ -1656,6 +1662,7 @@  void cpufreq_suspend(void)
 void cpufreq_resume(void)
 {
 	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (!cpufreq_driver)
 		return;
@@ -1668,13 +1675,20 @@  void cpufreq_resume(void)
 	pr_debug("%s: Resuming Governors\n", __func__);
 
 	for_each_active_policy(policy) {
-		if (cpufreq_driver->resume && cpufreq_driver->resume(policy))
+		if (cpufreq_driver->resume && cpufreq_driver->resume(policy)) {
 			pr_err("%s: Failed to resume driver: %p\n", __func__,
 				policy);
-		else if (__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START)
-		    || __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS))
-			pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor for policy: %p\n",
-				__func__, policy);
+		} else {
+			down_write(&policy->rwsem);
+			ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
+			if (!ret)
+				__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
+			up_write(&policy->rwsem);
+
+			if (ret)
+				pr_err("%s: Failed to start governor for policy: %p\n",
+				       __func__, policy);
+		}
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -2325,8 +2339,11 @@  static int cpufreq_boost_set_sw(int state)
 				       __func__);
 				break;
 			}
+
+			down_write(&policy->rwsem);
 			policy->user_policy.max = policy->max;
 			__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS);
+			up_write(&policy->rwsem);
 		}
 	}