@@ -89,12 +89,11 @@ static int check_results(int span)
static int mbm_setup(int num, ...)
{
struct resctrl_val_param *p;
- static int num_of_runs;
va_list param;
int ret = 0;
/* Run NUM_OF_RUNS times */
- if (num_of_runs++ >= NUM_OF_RUNS)
+ if (p->num_of_runs >= NUM_OF_RUNS)
return -1;
va_start(param, num);
@@ -102,9 +101,10 @@ static int mbm_setup(int num, ...)
va_end(param);
/* Set up shemata with 100% allocation on the first run. */
- if (num_of_runs == 0)
+ if (p->num_of_runs == 0)
ret = write_schemata(p->ctrlgrp, "100", p->cpu_no,
p->resctrl_val);
+ p->num_of_runs++;
return ret;
}
There is a comment "Set up shemata with 100% allocation on the first run" in function mbm_setup(), but there is an increment bug and the condition "num_of_runs == 0" will never be met and write_schemata() will never be called to set schemata to 100%. This is currently fine because resctl_val_parm->num_resctrlfs is always 1 and umount/mount will be run in each test to set the schemata to 100%. To make mbm_setup() future code-change proof, fix to call write-schemata() properly when the function is called for the first time. Also, remove static local variable 'num_of_runs' because this is not needed as there is resctl_val_param->num_of_runs which should be used instead like in cat_setup(). Signed-off-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/mbm_test.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)