diff mbox series

dma-buf: use strscpy() is more robust and safer

Message ID 20220916063152.155257-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn
State New
Headers show
Series dma-buf: use strscpy() is more robust and safer | expand

Commit Message

Lv Ruyi Sept. 16, 2022, 6:31 a.m. UTC 
From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>

The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.

That's now the recommended way to copy NUL terminated strings.

Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
---
 drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
index dd0f83ee505b..51cdd4060539 100644
--- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
+++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@  static char *dmabuffs_dname(struct dentry *dentry, char *buffer, int buflen)
 	dmabuf = dentry->d_fsdata;
 	spin_lock(&dmabuf->name_lock);
 	if (dmabuf->name)
-		ret = strlcpy(name, dmabuf->name, DMA_BUF_NAME_LEN);
+		ret = strscpy(name, dmabuf->name, DMA_BUF_NAME_LEN);
 	spin_unlock(&dmabuf->name_lock);
 
 	return dynamic_dname(buffer, buflen, "/%s:%s",