| Message ID | 6dfd4d3a4d77f97f13ab3f22bc53c96c38ba908e.1661007339.git.sander@svanheule.net |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 6afd9db630b037c7f0bc939368216512568de607 |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2,1/5] lib/test_cpumask: drop cpu_possible_mask full test | expand |
diff --git a/lib/test_cpumask.c b/lib/test_cpumask.c index a31a1622f1f6..4ebf9f5805f3 100644 --- a/lib/test_cpumask.c +++ b/lib/test_cpumask.c @@ -54,7 +54,6 @@ static cpumask_t mask_all; static void test_cpumask_weight(struct kunit *test) { KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_empty(&mask_empty)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_full(cpu_possible_mask)); KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, cpumask_full(&mask_all)); KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, cpumask_weight(&mask_empty));
When the number of CPUs that can possibly be brought online is known at boot time, e.g. when HOTPLUG is disabled, nr_cpu_ids may be smaller than NR_CPUS. In that case, cpu_possible_mask would not be completely filled, and cpumask_full(cpu_possible_mask) can return false for valid system configurations. Fixes: c41e8866c28c ("lib/test: introduce cpumask KUnit test suite") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/346cb279-8e75-24b0-7d12-9803f2b41c73@riseup.net/ Reported-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@riseup.net> Signed-off-by: Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net> Tested-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@riseup.net> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> --- Changes in v2: Rewrite commit message to explain why this test is wrong lib/test_cpumask.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)