diff mbox series

[RESEND] net: Fix UAF in ieee80211_scan_rx()

Message ID 20220721101018.17902-1-code@siddh.me
State Superseded
Headers show
Series [RESEND] net: Fix UAF in ieee80211_scan_rx() | expand

Commit Message

Siddh Raman Pant July 21, 2022, 10:10 a.m. UTC
ieee80211_scan_rx() tries to access scan_req->flags after a null check
(see line 303 of mac80211/scan.c), but ___cfg80211_scan_done() uses
kfree() on the scan_req (see line 991 of wireless/scan.c).

This results in a UAF.

ieee80211_scan_rx() is called inside a RCU read-critical section
initiated by ieee80211_rx_napi() (see line 5043 of mac80211/rx.c).

Thus, add an rcu_head to the scan_req struct so as to use kfree_rcu()
instead of kfree() so that we don't free during the critical section.

Bug report (3): https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=f9acff9bf08a845f225d
Reported-by: syzbot+f9acff9bf08a845f225d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+6cb476b7c69916a0caca@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+9250865a55539d384347@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

Signed-off-by: Siddh Raman Pant <code@siddh.me>
---
Resending because didn't get any reply from maintainers for more
than 2 weeks.

 include/net/cfg80211.h | 2 ++
 net/wireless/scan.c    | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Siddh Raman Pant July 30, 2022, 3:51 p.m. UTC | #1
Hello Lukas,

Sorry for the late reply.

On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 16:05:01 +0530  Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> wrote:
> Siddh,
> 
> I had a look at the Bug report above. Currently, we do not have any
> syzkaller or C reproducer to confirm that the bug was actually fixed.
> 
> Now, that you have a supposed fix for the issue:
> Can you write a 'stress test' and (qemu) setup script that eventually
> makes that bug trigger (e.g., if we run the stress test for two or
> three days it will eventually trigger)? Then, we can also use that to
> confirm that your patch fixes the issue (beyond the normal sanity code
> review).
> 
> This is certainly something you can do on your side to move this patch
> forward, and other developers with testing infrastructure can pick up
> and confirm your tests and results independently.

I have been intermittently looking about this for the past few days. Since
such test creation is new to me, I am stuck at how to go about calling the
requisite function.

What I have gathered is that I need to use the netlink API or related tool
and issue the scan and recieve commands. Since qemu by default doesn't
have a WiFi interface setup by default, I was looking at simulation and
came across the mac80211_hwsim module. After building the kernel it, I
tried using `iw` command for scanning with the two phy simulated devices,
but I seem to hit a deadend due to not being able to properly use them
for the task at hand.

Do you have any resources or/and examples on such "stress tests"?

> I hope this helps, otherwise you will just need to have some patience.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Lukas

Eric had replied to me on the original email soon after, and I have sent
a v2. Though, I still want to see how people go about making the tests,
so any resources for further exploring will be useful.

Thanks,
Siddh
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/net/cfg80211.h b/include/net/cfg80211.h
index 6d02e12e4702..ba4a49884de8 100644
--- a/include/net/cfg80211.h
+++ b/include/net/cfg80211.h
@@ -2368,6 +2368,7 @@  struct cfg80211_scan_6ghz_params {
  * @n_6ghz_params: number of 6 GHz params
  * @scan_6ghz_params: 6 GHz params
  * @bssid: BSSID to scan for (most commonly, the wildcard BSSID)
+ * @rcu_head: (internal) RCU head to use for freeing
  */
 struct cfg80211_scan_request {
 	struct cfg80211_ssid *ssids;
@@ -2397,6 +2398,7 @@  struct cfg80211_scan_request {
 	bool scan_6ghz;
 	u32 n_6ghz_params;
 	struct cfg80211_scan_6ghz_params *scan_6ghz_params;
+	struct rcu_head rcu_head;
 
 	/* keep last */
 	struct ieee80211_channel *channels[];
diff --git a/net/wireless/scan.c b/net/wireless/scan.c
index 6d82bd9eaf8c..638b2805222c 100644
--- a/net/wireless/scan.c
+++ b/net/wireless/scan.c
@@ -988,7 +988,7 @@  void ___cfg80211_scan_done(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev,
 	kfree(rdev->int_scan_req);
 	rdev->int_scan_req = NULL;
 
-	kfree(rdev->scan_req);
+	kfree_rcu(rdev->scan_req, rcu_head);
 	rdev->scan_req = NULL;
 
 	if (!send_message)