diff mbox series

cpuidle: riscv-sbi: Fix CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_xyz() macro usage

Message ID 20220718084553.2056169-1-apatel@ventanamicro.com
State Accepted
Commit cfadbb9df8c4dc917787da4458327e5ec14743d4
Headers show
Series cpuidle: riscv-sbi: Fix CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_xyz() macro usage | expand

Commit Message

Anup Patel July 18, 2022, 8:45 a.m. UTC
Currently, we are using CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM() for all SBI HSM
suspend types so retentive suspend types are also treated non-retentive
and kernel will do redundant additional work for these states.

The BIT[31] of SBI HSM suspend types allows us to differentiate between
retentive and non-retentive suspend types so we should use this BIT
to call appropriate CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_xyz() macro.

Fixes: 6abf32f1d9c5 ("cpuidle: Add RISC-V SBI CPU idle driver")
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
---
 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c | 7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Anup Patel Aug. 29, 2022, 2:59 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Palmer,

On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 2:16 PM Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>
> Currently, we are using CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM() for all SBI HSM
> suspend types so retentive suspend types are also treated non-retentive
> and kernel will do redundant additional work for these states.
>
> The BIT[31] of SBI HSM suspend types allows us to differentiate between
> retentive and non-retentive suspend types so we should use this BIT
> to call appropriate CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_xyz() macro.
>
> Fixes: 6abf32f1d9c5 ("cpuidle: Add RISC-V SBI CPU idle driver")
> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>

Can you please take this patch through the RISC-V tree ?

Regards,
Anup

> ---
>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> index 1151e5e2ba82..33c92fec4365 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
> @@ -97,8 +97,13 @@ static int sbi_cpuidle_enter_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>                                    struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int idx)
>  {
>         u32 *states = __this_cpu_read(sbi_cpuidle_data.states);
> +       u32 state = states[idx];
>
> -       return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM(sbi_suspend, idx, states[idx]);
> +       if (state & SBI_HSM_SUSP_NON_RET_BIT)
> +               return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM(sbi_suspend, idx, state);
> +       else
> +               return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_RETENTION_PARAM(sbi_suspend,
> +                                                            idx, state);
>  }
>
>  static int __sbi_enter_domain_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Palmer Dabbelt Sept. 22, 2022, 5:07 p.m. UTC | #2
On Sun, 28 Aug 2022 19:59:45 PDT (-0700), anup@brainfault.org wrote:
> Hi Palmer,
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 2:16 PM Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com> wrote:
>>
>> Currently, we are using CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM() for all SBI HSM
>> suspend types so retentive suspend types are also treated non-retentive
>> and kernel will do redundant additional work for these states.
>>
>> The BIT[31] of SBI HSM suspend types allows us to differentiate between
>> retentive and non-retentive suspend types so we should use this BIT
>> to call appropriate CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_xyz() macro.
>>
>> Fixes: 6abf32f1d9c5 ("cpuidle: Add RISC-V SBI CPU idle driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@ventanamicro.com>
>
> Can you please take this patch through the RISC-V tree ?

Sorry I missed this, I didn't realize you wanted me to merge it.  It's 
on fixes.

>
> Regards,
> Anup
>
>> ---
>>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c | 7 ++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
>> index 1151e5e2ba82..33c92fec4365 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
>> @@ -97,8 +97,13 @@ static int sbi_cpuidle_enter_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>>                                    struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int idx)
>>  {
>>         u32 *states = __this_cpu_read(sbi_cpuidle_data.states);
>> +       u32 state = states[idx];
>>
>> -       return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM(sbi_suspend, idx, states[idx]);
>> +       if (state & SBI_HSM_SUSP_NON_RET_BIT)
>> +               return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM(sbi_suspend, idx, state);
>> +       else
>> +               return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_RETENTION_PARAM(sbi_suspend,
>> +                                                            idx, state);
>>  }
>>
>>  static int __sbi_enter_domain_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
index 1151e5e2ba82..33c92fec4365 100644
--- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
+++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-riscv-sbi.c
@@ -97,8 +97,13 @@  static int sbi_cpuidle_enter_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
 				   struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int idx)
 {
 	u32 *states = __this_cpu_read(sbi_cpuidle_data.states);
+	u32 state = states[idx];
 
-	return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM(sbi_suspend, idx, states[idx]);
+	if (state & SBI_HSM_SUSP_NON_RET_BIT)
+		return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM(sbi_suspend, idx, state);
+	else
+		return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_RETENTION_PARAM(sbi_suspend,
+							     idx, state);
 }
 
 static int __sbi_enter_domain_idle_state(struct cpuidle_device *dev,