@@ -247,13 +247,13 @@ int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
.start = __kunit_suites_start,
.end = __kunit_suites_end,
};
- int err;
+ int err = 0;
if (filter_glob_param) {
suite_set = kunit_filter_suites(&suite_set, filter_glob_param, &err);
if (err) {
pr_err("kunit executor: error filtering suites: %d\n", err);
- return err;
+ goto out;
}
}
@@ -268,9 +268,10 @@ int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
kunit_free_suite_set(suite_set);
}
- kunit_handle_shutdown();
- return 0;
+out:
+ kunit_handle_shutdown();
+ return err;
}
#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT_TEST)
The existing logic happens to work fine on UML, but is not correct when running on other arches. 1. We didn't initialize `int err`, and kunit_filter_suites() doesn't explicitly set it to 0 on success. So we had false "failures". Note: it doesn't happen on UML, causing this to get overlooked. 2. If we error out, we do not call kunit_handle_shutdown(). This makes kunit.py timeout when using a non-UML arch, since the QEMU process doesn't ever exit. Fixes: a02353f49162 ("kunit: bail out of test filtering logic quicker if OOM") Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> --- lib/kunit/executor.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) base-commit: 9660209d9418f2295d31fea0d32e313e9b2c1200