Message ID | 1448366481-10279-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | e14f0eb12f920fd96b9f79d15cedd437648e8667 |
Headers | show |
(Apologies if you got two copies of this -- I mangled the --from argument to git send-email first time round and the list servers rejected the mail. -- PMM) On 24 November 2015 at 12:01, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote: > The checks for the unallocated encodings in the ldst_excl group > (exclusives and load-acquire/store-release) were not correct. This > error meant that in turn we ended up with code attempting to handle > the non-existent case of "non-exclusive load-acquire/store-release > pair". Delete that broken and now unreachable code. > > Reported-by: Laurent Desnogues <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> > --- > The easiest way to validate that we have the unallocated > conditions correct now is to look at C4.4.6 "load/store exclusive" > in the v8 ARM ARM rev A.3h: our three conditions correspond > to the three "unallocated" rows in the decode table. > > v2 changes: remove incorrect comment too. > --- > target-arm/translate-a64.c | 15 ++------------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target-arm/translate-a64.c b/target-arm/translate-a64.c > index fe485a4..14e8131 100644 > --- a/target-arm/translate-a64.c > +++ b/target-arm/translate-a64.c > @@ -1816,9 +1816,6 @@ static void gen_store_exclusive(DisasContext *s, int rd, int rt, int rt2, > * o2: 0 -> exclusive, 1 -> not > * o1: 0 -> single register, 1 -> register pair > * o0: 1 -> load-acquire/store-release, 0 -> not > - * > - * o0 == 0 AND o2 == 1 is un-allocated > - * o1 == 1 is un-allocated except for 32 and 64 bit sizes > */ > static void disas_ldst_excl(DisasContext *s, uint32_t insn) > { > @@ -1833,7 +1830,8 @@ static void disas_ldst_excl(DisasContext *s, uint32_t insn) > int size = extract32(insn, 30, 2); > TCGv_i64 tcg_addr; > > - if ((!is_excl && !is_lasr) || > + if ((!is_excl && !is_pair && !is_lasr) || > + (!is_excl && is_pair) || > (is_pair && size < 2)) { > unallocated_encoding(s); > return; > @@ -1862,15 +1860,6 @@ static void disas_ldst_excl(DisasContext *s, uint32_t insn) > } else { > do_gpr_ld(s, tcg_rt, tcg_addr, size, false, false); > } > - if (is_pair) { > - TCGv_i64 tcg_rt2 = cpu_reg(s, rt); > - tcg_gen_addi_i64(tcg_addr, tcg_addr, 1 << size); > - if (is_store) { > - do_gpr_st(s, tcg_rt2, tcg_addr, size); > - } else { > - do_gpr_ld(s, tcg_rt2, tcg_addr, size, false, false); > - } > - } > } > } > > -- > 1.9.1
diff --git a/target-arm/translate-a64.c b/target-arm/translate-a64.c index fe485a4..14e8131 100644 --- a/target-arm/translate-a64.c +++ b/target-arm/translate-a64.c @@ -1816,9 +1816,6 @@ static void gen_store_exclusive(DisasContext *s, int rd, int rt, int rt2, * o2: 0 -> exclusive, 1 -> not * o1: 0 -> single register, 1 -> register pair * o0: 1 -> load-acquire/store-release, 0 -> not - * - * o0 == 0 AND o2 == 1 is un-allocated - * o1 == 1 is un-allocated except for 32 and 64 bit sizes */ static void disas_ldst_excl(DisasContext *s, uint32_t insn) { @@ -1833,7 +1830,8 @@ static void disas_ldst_excl(DisasContext *s, uint32_t insn) int size = extract32(insn, 30, 2); TCGv_i64 tcg_addr; - if ((!is_excl && !is_lasr) || + if ((!is_excl && !is_pair && !is_lasr) || + (!is_excl && is_pair) || (is_pair && size < 2)) { unallocated_encoding(s); return; @@ -1862,15 +1860,6 @@ static void disas_ldst_excl(DisasContext *s, uint32_t insn) } else { do_gpr_ld(s, tcg_rt, tcg_addr, size, false, false); } - if (is_pair) { - TCGv_i64 tcg_rt2 = cpu_reg(s, rt); - tcg_gen_addi_i64(tcg_addr, tcg_addr, 1 << size); - if (is_store) { - do_gpr_st(s, tcg_rt2, tcg_addr, size); - } else { - do_gpr_ld(s, tcg_rt2, tcg_addr, size, false, false); - } - } } }
The checks for the unallocated encodings in the ldst_excl group (exclusives and load-acquire/store-release) were not correct. This error meant that in turn we ended up with code attempting to handle the non-existent case of "non-exclusive load-acquire/store-release pair". Delete that broken and now unreachable code. Reported-by: Laurent Desnogues <laurent.desnogues@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> --- The easiest way to validate that we have the unallocated conditions correct now is to look at C4.4.6 "load/store exclusive" in the v8 ARM ARM rev A.3h: our three conditions correspond to the three "unallocated" rows in the decode table. v2 changes: remove incorrect comment too. --- target-arm/translate-a64.c | 15 ++------------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) -- 1.9.1