Message ID | 20220305204720.2978554-1-festevam@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2,net] smsc95xx: Ignore -ENODEV errors when device is unplugged | expand |
Am Samstag, 5. März 2022, 21:47:20 CET schrieb Fabio Estevam: > From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de> > > According to Documentation/driver-api/usb/URB.rst when a device > is unplugged usb_submit_urb() returns -ENODEV. > > This error code propagates all the way up to usbnet_read_cmd() and > usbnet_write_cmd() calls inside the smsc95xx.c driver during > Ethernet cable unplug, unbind or reboot. > > This causes the following errors to be shown on reboot, for example: > > ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.1: remove, state 1 > usb usb2: USB disconnect, device number 1 > usb 2-1: USB disconnect, device number 2 > usb 2-1.1: USB disconnect, device number 3 > smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth1: unregister 'smsc95xx' usb-ci_hdrc.1-1.1, smsc95xx > USB 2.0 Ethernet smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth1: Failed to read reg index > 0x00000114: -19 > smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth1: Error reading MII_ACCESS > smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth1: __smsc95xx_mdio_read: MII is busy > smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth1: Failed to read reg index 0x00000114: -19 > smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth1: Error reading MII_ACCESS > smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth1: __smsc95xx_mdio_read: MII is busy > smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth1: hardware isn't capable of remote wakeup > usb 2-1.4: USB disconnect, device number 4 > ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.1: USB bus 2 deregistered > ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.0: remove, state 4 > usb usb1: USB disconnect, device number 1 > ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.0: USB bus 1 deregistered > imx2-wdt 30280000.watchdog: Device shutdown: Expect reboot! > reboot: Restarting system > > Ignore the -ENODEV errors inside __smsc95xx_mdio_read() and > __smsc95xx_phy_wait_not_busy() and do not print error messages > when -ENODEV is returned. > > Fixes: a049a30fc27c ("net: usb: Correct PHY handling of smsc95xx") > Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@denx.de> Oh BTW, is this queued for stable? Which versions? If 'Fixes: a049a30fc27c ("net: usb: Correct PHY handling of smsc95xx")' is the indicator, it's not enough. This errors also shows up on v5.15.27 and is fixed with this patch. Regards, Alexander > --- > Changes since v1: > - Added 'net' annotation - Andrew > - Added Fixes tag - Andrew > - Avoided undefined 'buf' behaviour in __smsc95xx_read_reg() - Andrew > > drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c b/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c > index b17bff6a1015..e5b744851146 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c > +++ b/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c > @@ -84,9 +84,10 @@ static int __must_check __smsc95xx_read_reg(struct usbnet > *dev, u32 index, ret = fn(dev, USB_VENDOR_REQUEST_READ_REGISTER, USB_DIR_IN > > | USB_TYPE_VENDOR | USB_RECIP_DEVICE, > > 0, index, &buf, 4); > - if (unlikely(ret < 0)) { > - netdev_warn(dev->net, "Failed to read reg index 0x%08x: %d\n", > - index, ret); > + if (ret < 0) { > + if (ret != -ENODEV) > + netdev_warn(dev->net, "Failed to read reg index 0x%08x: %d\n", > + index, ret); > return ret; > } > > @@ -116,7 +117,7 @@ static int __must_check __smsc95xx_write_reg(struct > usbnet *dev, u32 index, ret = fn(dev, USB_VENDOR_REQUEST_WRITE_REGISTER, > USB_DIR_OUT > > | USB_TYPE_VENDOR | USB_RECIP_DEVICE, > > 0, index, &buf, 4); > - if (unlikely(ret < 0)) > + if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENODEV) > netdev_warn(dev->net, "Failed to write reg index 0x%08x: %d\n", > index, ret); > > @@ -159,6 +160,9 @@ static int __must_check > __smsc95xx_phy_wait_not_busy(struct usbnet *dev, do { > ret = __smsc95xx_read_reg(dev, MII_ADDR, &val, in_pm); > if (ret < 0) { > + /* Ignore -ENODEV error during disconnect() */ > + if (ret == -ENODEV) > + return 0; > netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error reading MII_ACCESS\n"); > return ret; > } > @@ -194,7 +198,8 @@ static int __smsc95xx_mdio_read(struct usbnet *dev, int > phy_id, int idx, addr = mii_address_cmd(phy_id, idx, MII_READ_ | > MII_BUSY_); > ret = __smsc95xx_write_reg(dev, MII_ADDR, addr, in_pm); > if (ret < 0) { > - netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_ADDR\n"); > + if (ret != -ENODEV) > + netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_ADDR\n"); > goto done; > } > > @@ -206,7 +211,8 @@ static int __smsc95xx_mdio_read(struct usbnet *dev, int > phy_id, int idx, > > ret = __smsc95xx_read_reg(dev, MII_DATA, &val, in_pm); > if (ret < 0) { > - netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error reading MII_DATA\n"); > + if (ret != -ENODEV) > + netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error reading MII_DATA\n"); > goto done; > } > > @@ -214,6 +220,10 @@ static int __smsc95xx_mdio_read(struct usbnet *dev, int > phy_id, int idx, > > done: > mutex_unlock(&dev->phy_mutex); > + > + /* Ignore -ENODEV error during disconnect() */ > + if (ret == -ENODEV) > + return 0; > return ret; > } > > @@ -235,7 +245,8 @@ static void __smsc95xx_mdio_write(struct usbnet *dev, > int phy_id, val = regval; > ret = __smsc95xx_write_reg(dev, MII_DATA, val, in_pm); > if (ret < 0) { > - netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_DATA\n"); > + if (ret != -ENODEV) > + netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_DATA\n"); > goto done; > } > > @@ -243,7 +254,8 @@ static void __smsc95xx_mdio_write(struct usbnet *dev, > int phy_id, addr = mii_address_cmd(phy_id, idx, MII_WRITE_ | MII_BUSY_); > ret = __smsc95xx_write_reg(dev, MII_ADDR, addr, in_pm); > if (ret < 0) { > - netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_ADDR\n"); > + if (ret != -ENODEV) > + netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_ADDR\n"); > goto done; > }
Hi Alexander, On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 11:02 AM Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@ew.tq-group.com> wrote: > Oh BTW, is this queued for stable? Which versions? If 'Fixes: a049a30fc27c > ("net: usb: Correct PHY handling of smsc95xx")' is the indicator, it's not > enough. This errors also shows up on v5.15.27 and is fixed with this patch. ("net: usb: Correct PHY handling of smsc95xx")' is also present in 5.15: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/log/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c?h=v5.15.27 so the fix should land in 5.15 too. For 5.10, when the fix reaches Linus' tree, then I will ping Dave/Jakub/Greg to apply the 3 latest smsc95xx commits to 5.10 stable tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git/log/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c?id=c70c453abcbf I have been running 5.10 + the 3 commits above and no more smsc95xx errors are seen.
diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c b/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c index b17bff6a1015..e5b744851146 100644 --- a/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c +++ b/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c @@ -84,9 +84,10 @@ static int __must_check __smsc95xx_read_reg(struct usbnet *dev, u32 index, ret = fn(dev, USB_VENDOR_REQUEST_READ_REGISTER, USB_DIR_IN | USB_TYPE_VENDOR | USB_RECIP_DEVICE, 0, index, &buf, 4); - if (unlikely(ret < 0)) { - netdev_warn(dev->net, "Failed to read reg index 0x%08x: %d\n", - index, ret); + if (ret < 0) { + if (ret != -ENODEV) + netdev_warn(dev->net, "Failed to read reg index 0x%08x: %d\n", + index, ret); return ret; } @@ -116,7 +117,7 @@ static int __must_check __smsc95xx_write_reg(struct usbnet *dev, u32 index, ret = fn(dev, USB_VENDOR_REQUEST_WRITE_REGISTER, USB_DIR_OUT | USB_TYPE_VENDOR | USB_RECIP_DEVICE, 0, index, &buf, 4); - if (unlikely(ret < 0)) + if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENODEV) netdev_warn(dev->net, "Failed to write reg index 0x%08x: %d\n", index, ret); @@ -159,6 +160,9 @@ static int __must_check __smsc95xx_phy_wait_not_busy(struct usbnet *dev, do { ret = __smsc95xx_read_reg(dev, MII_ADDR, &val, in_pm); if (ret < 0) { + /* Ignore -ENODEV error during disconnect() */ + if (ret == -ENODEV) + return 0; netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error reading MII_ACCESS\n"); return ret; } @@ -194,7 +198,8 @@ static int __smsc95xx_mdio_read(struct usbnet *dev, int phy_id, int idx, addr = mii_address_cmd(phy_id, idx, MII_READ_ | MII_BUSY_); ret = __smsc95xx_write_reg(dev, MII_ADDR, addr, in_pm); if (ret < 0) { - netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_ADDR\n"); + if (ret != -ENODEV) + netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_ADDR\n"); goto done; } @@ -206,7 +211,8 @@ static int __smsc95xx_mdio_read(struct usbnet *dev, int phy_id, int idx, ret = __smsc95xx_read_reg(dev, MII_DATA, &val, in_pm); if (ret < 0) { - netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error reading MII_DATA\n"); + if (ret != -ENODEV) + netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error reading MII_DATA\n"); goto done; } @@ -214,6 +220,10 @@ static int __smsc95xx_mdio_read(struct usbnet *dev, int phy_id, int idx, done: mutex_unlock(&dev->phy_mutex); + + /* Ignore -ENODEV error during disconnect() */ + if (ret == -ENODEV) + return 0; return ret; } @@ -235,7 +245,8 @@ static void __smsc95xx_mdio_write(struct usbnet *dev, int phy_id, val = regval; ret = __smsc95xx_write_reg(dev, MII_DATA, val, in_pm); if (ret < 0) { - netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_DATA\n"); + if (ret != -ENODEV) + netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_DATA\n"); goto done; } @@ -243,7 +254,8 @@ static void __smsc95xx_mdio_write(struct usbnet *dev, int phy_id, addr = mii_address_cmd(phy_id, idx, MII_WRITE_ | MII_BUSY_); ret = __smsc95xx_write_reg(dev, MII_ADDR, addr, in_pm); if (ret < 0) { - netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_ADDR\n"); + if (ret != -ENODEV) + netdev_warn(dev->net, "Error writing MII_ADDR\n"); goto done; }