Message ID | 20220113161846.1932-1-jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | ACPI: PCC: make pcc_ctx static | expand |
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 12:18:46AM +0800, Jiapeng Chong wrote: > This symbol is not used outside of acpi_pcc.c, so marks it static. > > Fix the following sparse warning: > > drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c:34:22: warning: symbol 'pcc_ctx' was not > declared. Should it be static? > > Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> The fix is now already applied [1]
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c index 41e3ebd204ff..a12b55d81209 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ struct pcc_data { struct acpi_pcc_info ctx; }; -struct acpi_pcc_info pcc_ctx; +static struct acpi_pcc_info pcc_ctx; static void pcc_rx_callback(struct mbox_client *cl, void *m) {
This symbol is not used outside of acpi_pcc.c, so marks it static. Fix the following sparse warning: drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c:34:22: warning: symbol 'pcc_ctx' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com> --- drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)