| Message ID | 20220111201722.327219-20-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | pinctrl: dt-bindings: samsung: convert to dtschema | expand |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> > Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 5:17 AM > To: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>; Krzysztof Kozlowski > <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>; Sylwester Nawrocki > <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>; Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>; Rob > Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux- > samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org; > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>; Sam Protsenko > <semen.protsenko@linaro.org>; Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com>; > Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@gmail.com> > Subject: [PATCH v2 26/28] pinctrl: samsung: add support for Exynos850 and > ExynosAutov9 wake-ups > > It seems that newer ARMv8 Exynos SoC like Exynos850 and > ExynosAutov9 have differences of their pin controller node capable of > external wake-up interrupts: > 1. No multiplexed external wake-up interrupt, only direct, 2. More than > one pin controller capable of external wake-up interrupts. > > Add support for dedicated Exynos850 and ExynosAutov9 compatibles. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com> And you can also put Tested-by: Chanho Park <chanho61.park@samsung.com> Best Regards, Chanho Park
On Tue, 11 Jan 2022 at 22:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> wrote: > > It seems that newer ARMv8 Exynos SoC like Exynos850 and > ExynosAutov9 have differences of their pin controller node capable of > external wake-up interrupts: > 1. No multiplexed external wake-up interrupt, only direct, > 2. More than one pin controller capable of external wake-up interrupts. > > Add support for dedicated Exynos850 and ExynosAutov9 compatibles. > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> > --- Reviewed-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org> > drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c > index 0489c899b401..a158d587814e 100644 > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c > @@ -465,6 +465,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id exynos_wkup_irq_ids[] = { > .data = &exynos4210_wkup_irq_chip }, > { .compatible = "samsung,exynos7-wakeup-eint", > .data = &exynos7_wkup_irq_chip }, > + { .compatible = "samsung,exynos850-wakeup-eint", > + .data = &exynos7_wkup_irq_chip }, > + { .compatible = "samsung,exynosautov9-wakeup-eint", > + .data = &exynos7_wkup_irq_chip }, > { } > }; > > -- > 2.32.0 >
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c index 0489c899b401..a158d587814e 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c @@ -465,6 +465,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id exynos_wkup_irq_ids[] = { .data = &exynos4210_wkup_irq_chip }, { .compatible = "samsung,exynos7-wakeup-eint", .data = &exynos7_wkup_irq_chip }, + { .compatible = "samsung,exynos850-wakeup-eint", + .data = &exynos7_wkup_irq_chip }, + { .compatible = "samsung,exynosautov9-wakeup-eint", + .data = &exynos7_wkup_irq_chip }, { } };
It seems that newer ARMv8 Exynos SoC like Exynos850 and ExynosAutov9 have differences of their pin controller node capable of external wake-up interrupts: 1. No multiplexed external wake-up interrupt, only direct, 2. More than one pin controller capable of external wake-up interrupts. Add support for dedicated Exynos850 and ExynosAutov9 compatibles. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com> --- drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)