@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static struct devfreq *find_device_devfreq(struct device *dev)
{
struct devfreq *tmp_devfreq;
- if (unlikely(IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev))) {
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev)) {
pr_err("DEVFREQ: %s: Invalid parameters\n", __func__);
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static struct devfreq_governor *find_devfreq_governor(const char *name)
{
struct devfreq_governor *tmp_governor;
- if (unlikely(IS_ERR_OR_NULL(name))) {
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(name)) {
pr_err("DEVFREQ: %s: Invalid parameters\n", __func__);
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
IS_ERR(_OR_NULL) already contain an 'unlikely' compiler flag and there is no need to do that again from its callers. Drop it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- drivers/devfreq/devfreq.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)