@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static struct device_opp *_find_device_opp(struct device *dev)
{
struct device_opp *tmp_dev_opp, *dev_opp = ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
- if (unlikely(IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev))) {
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev)) {
pr_err("%s: Invalid parameters\n", __func__);
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ unsigned long dev_pm_opp_get_voltage(struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
opp_rcu_lockdep_assert();
tmp_opp = rcu_dereference(opp);
- if (unlikely(IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tmp_opp)) || !tmp_opp->available)
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tmp_opp) || !tmp_opp->available)
pr_err("%s: Invalid parameters\n", __func__);
else
v = tmp_opp->u_volt;
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ unsigned long dev_pm_opp_get_freq(struct dev_pm_opp *opp)
opp_rcu_lockdep_assert();
tmp_opp = rcu_dereference(opp);
- if (unlikely(IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tmp_opp)) || !tmp_opp->available)
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tmp_opp) || !tmp_opp->available)
pr_err("%s: Invalid parameters\n", __func__);
else
f = tmp_opp->rate;
IS_ERR(_OR_NULL) already contain an 'unlikely' compiler flag and there is no need to do that again from its callers. Drop it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- drivers/base/power/opp.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)