diff mbox series

[v3,28/32] staging: wfx: fix comments styles

Message ID 20210913130203.1903622-29-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com
State New
Headers show
Series staging/wfx: usual maintenance | expand

Commit Message

Jérôme Pouiller Sept. 13, 2021, 1:01 p.m. UTC 
From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com>

Unify all comments of the wfx driver to use the same comment style.

Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@silabs.com>
---
 drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c      | 11 +++--------
 drivers/staging/wfx/bus_spi.c |  6 ++----
 drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c    |  3 +--
 drivers/staging/wfx/main.h    |  3 +--
 drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c    |  3 +--
 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c
index e956b5a5ccac..a0f9d1b53019 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c
@@ -265,9 +265,7 @@  static void bh_work(struct work_struct *work)
 			wdev->hif.tx_buffers_used, release_chip);
 }
 
-/*
- * An IRQ from chip did occur
- */
+/* An IRQ from chip did occur */
 void wfx_bh_request_rx(struct wfx_dev *wdev)
 {
 	u32 cur, prev;
@@ -285,16 +283,13 @@  void wfx_bh_request_rx(struct wfx_dev *wdev)
 			prev, cur);
 }
 
-/*
- * Driver want to send data
- */
+/* Driver want to send data */
 void wfx_bh_request_tx(struct wfx_dev *wdev)
 {
 	queue_work(system_highpri_wq, &wdev->hif.bh);
 }
 
-/*
- * If IRQ is not available, this function allow to manually poll the control
+/* If IRQ is not available, this function allow to manually poll the control
  * register and simulate an IRQ ahen an event happened.
  *
  * Note that the device has a bug: If an IRQ raise while host read control
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/bus_spi.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/bus_spi.c
index 61f73b3ebc80..55ffcd7c42e2 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/bus_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/bus_spi.c
@@ -38,8 +38,7 @@  struct wfx_spi_priv {
 	bool need_swab;
 };
 
-/*
- * The chip reads 16bits of data at time and place them directly into (little
+/* The chip reads 16bits of data at time and place them directly into (little
  * endian) CPU register. So, the chip expects bytes order to be "B1 B0 B3 B2"
  * (while LE is "B0 B1 B2 B3" and BE is "B3 B2 B1 B0")
  *
@@ -241,8 +240,7 @@  static int wfx_spi_remove(struct spi_device *func)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-/*
- * For dynamic driver binding, kernel does not use OF to match driver. It only
+/* For dynamic driver binding, kernel does not use OF to match driver. It only
  * use modalias and modalias is a copy of 'compatible' DT node with vendor
  * stripped.
  */
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
index c5ba0a50b474..98a9391b2bee 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/fwio.c
@@ -69,8 +69,7 @@  static const char * const fwio_errors[] = {
 	[ERR_MAC_KEY] = "MAC key not initialized",
 };
 
-/*
- * request_firmware() allocate data using vmalloc(). It is not compatible with
+/* request_firmware() allocate data using vmalloc(). It is not compatible with
  * underlying hardware that use DMA. Function below detect this case and
  * allocate a bounce buffer if necessary.
  *
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/main.h b/drivers/staging/wfx/main.h
index a0db322383a3..115abd2d4378 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/main.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/main.h
@@ -23,8 +23,7 @@  struct wfx_platform_data {
 	const char *file_fw;
 	const char *file_pds;
 	struct gpio_desc *gpio_wakeup;
-	/*
-	 * if true HIF D_out is sampled on the rising edge of the clock
+	/* if true HIF D_out is sampled on the rising edge of the clock
 	 * (intended to be used in 50Mhz SDIO)
 	 */
 	bool use_rising_clk;
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c
index 9e2d08317c9e..668ef2c60837 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c
@@ -85,8 +85,7 @@  static int send_scan_req(struct wfx_vif *wvif,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-/*
- * It is not really necessary to run scan request asynchronously. However,
+/* It is not really necessary to run scan request asynchronously. However,
  * there is a bug in "iw scan" when ieee80211_scan_completed() is called before
  * wfx_hw_scan() return
  */