Message ID | 1435157657-17843-1-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko@ti.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 977bd8a94c40851a843e9186b9eb823bdfa5ace2 |
Headers | show |
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> wrote: > From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@linaro.org> > > Add missed spin_unlock_irqrestore in omap_gpio_irq_type when > omap_set_gpio_triggering() is failed. > > It fixes static checker warning: > > drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c:523 omap_gpio_irq_type() > warn: inconsistent returns 'spin_lock:&bank->lock'. > > This fixes commit: > 1562e4618ded ('gpio: omap: fix error handling in omap_gpio_irq_type') > > Reported-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org> > Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@linaro.org> Patch applied for fixes. Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 9:34 AM, Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> wrote: > Hi Tony, > On 08/07/2015 06:36 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >> >> * Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> [150716 01:38]: >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Grygorii Strashko >>> <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> wrote: >>> >>>> From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@linaro.org> >>>> >>>> Add missed spin_unlock_irqrestore in omap_gpio_irq_type when >>>> omap_set_gpio_triggering() is failed. >>>> >>>> It fixes static checker warning: >>>> >>>> drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c:523 omap_gpio_irq_type() >>>> warn: inconsistent returns 'spin_lock:&bank->lock'. >>>> >>>> This fixes commit: >>>> 1562e4618ded ('gpio: omap: fix error handling in omap_gpio_irq_type') >>>> >>>> Reported-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org> >>>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@linaro.org> >>> >>> >>> Patch applied for fixes. >> >> >> Linus, looks like we now have a new build warning in Linux next >> with the fixes and raw_spinlock_t change, so a merge or a commit >> is needed. If you prefer a patch, here's one below. > > > Yes. It seems merge/rebase issue between fixes & next: > - this patch went through fixes and RAW spinlock conversation > patch through -next, and without merge conflicts. > > and patch has been posted already by Axel Lin: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg121031.html I merged v4.2-rc4 into my devel branch and applied Axel's patch to fix this mess. Check that it looks OK now... Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c index b0c57d5..a0ad803 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c @@ -500,8 +500,10 @@ static int omap_gpio_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned type) spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags); retval = omap_set_gpio_triggering(bank, offset, type); - if (retval) + if (retval) { + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags); goto error; + } omap_gpio_init_irq(bank, offset); if (!omap_gpio_is_input(bank, offset)) { spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);