@@ -2284,14 +2284,23 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
old_gov = policy->governor;
/* end old governor */
if (old_gov) {
- if(!(ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP))) {
+ ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
+ if (ret) {
+ /* This can happen due to race with other operations */
+ pr_debug("%s: Failed to Stop Governor: %s (%d)\n",
+ __func__, old_gov->name, ret);
+ return ret;
+ } else {
up_write(&policy->rwsem);
ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
down_write(&policy->rwsem);
- }
- if (ret)
- return ret;
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err("%s: Failed to Exit Governor: %s (%d)\n",
+ __func__, old_gov->name, ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
}
/* start new governor */
@@ -2309,7 +2318,9 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
pr_debug("starting governor %s failed\n", policy->governor->name);
if (old_gov) {
policy->governor = old_gov;
- if (!__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT))
+ if (__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT))
+ policy->governor = NULL;
+ else
__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
}
New-patch:
--------------8<-------------------
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 10:50:48 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: propagate errors returned from __cpufreq_governor()
Return codes aren't honored properly in cpufreq_set_policy(). This can
lead to two problems:
- wrong errors propagated to sysfs
- we try to do next state-change even if the previous one failed
cpufreq_governor_dbs() now returns proper errors on all invalid
state-transition requests and this code should honor that.
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
@@ -2284,16 +2284,29 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
old_gov = policy->governor;
/* end old governor */
if (old_gov) {
- __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
- up_write(&policy->rwsem);
- __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
- down_write(&policy->rwsem);
+ ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP);
+ if (ret) {
+ /* This can happen due to race with other operations */
+ pr_debug("%s: Failed to Stop Governor: %s (%d)\n",
+ __func__, old_gov->name, ret);
+ return ret;
+ } else {
+ up_write(&policy->rwsem);
+ ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT);
+ down_write(&policy->rwsem);
+
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_err("%s: Failed to Exit Governor: %s (%d)\n",
+ __func__, old_gov->name, ret);
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
}
/* start new governor */
policy->governor = new_policy->governor;
- if (!__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT)) {
- if (!__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START))
+ if (!(ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT))) {
+ if (!(ret = __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START)))
goto out;
up_write(&policy->rwsem);
@@ -2305,11 +2318,13 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
pr_debug("starting governor %s failed\n", policy->governor->name);
if (old_gov) {
policy->governor = old_gov;
- __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT);
- __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
+ if (__cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT))
+ policy->governor = NULL;
+ else
+ __cpufreq_governor(policy, CPUFREQ_GOV_START);
}
- return -EINVAL;
+ return ret;
out:
pr_debug("governor: change or update limits\n");