@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static const unsigned long guest_offloads[] = {
VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM
};
-#define GUEST_OFFLOAD_LRO_MASK ((1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) | \
+#define GUEST_OFFLOAD_GRO_HW_MASK ((1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) | \
(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6) | \
(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ECN) | \
(1ULL << VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO))
@@ -2481,7 +2481,7 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_set(struct net_device *dev, struct bpf_prog *prog,
virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_ECN) ||
virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_UFO) ||
virtio_has_feature(vi->vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM))) {
- NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Can't set XDP while host is implementing LRO/CSUM, disable LRO/CSUM first");
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Can't set XDP while host is implementing GRO_HW/CSUM, disable GRO_HW/CSUM first");
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
}
@@ -2612,15 +2612,15 @@ static int virtnet_set_features(struct net_device *dev,
u64 offloads;
int err;
- if ((dev->features ^ features) & NETIF_F_LRO) {
+ if ((dev->features ^ features) & NETIF_F_GRO_HW) {
if (vi->xdp_enabled)
return -EBUSY;
- if (features & NETIF_F_LRO)
+ if (features & NETIF_F_GRO_HW)
offloads = vi->guest_offloads_capable;
else
offloads = vi->guest_offloads_capable &
- ~GUEST_OFFLOAD_LRO_MASK;
+ ~GUEST_OFFLOAD_GRO_HW_MASK;
err = virtnet_set_guest_offloads(vi, offloads);
if (err)
@@ -3100,9 +3100,9 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
dev->features |= NETIF_F_RXCSUM;
if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO4) ||
virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_TSO6))
- dev->features |= NETIF_F_LRO;
+ dev->features |= NETIF_F_GRO_HW;
if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS))
- dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_LRO;
+ dev->hw_features |= NETIF_F_GRO_HW;
dev->vlan_features = dev->features;
Commit a02e8964eaf92 ("virtio-net: ethtool configurable LRO") maps LRO to virtio guest offloading features and allows the administrator to enable and disable those features via ethtool. This leads to several issues: - For a device that doesn't support control guest offloads, the "LRO" can't be disabled triggering WARN in dev_disable_lro() when turning off LRO or when enabling forwarding bridging etc. - For a device that supports control guest offloads, the guest offloads are disabled in cases of bridging, forwarding etc slowing down the traffic. Fix this by using NETIF_F_GRO_HW instead. Though the spec does not guarantee packets to be re-segmented as the original ones, we can add that to the spec, possibly with a flag for devices to differentiate between GRO and LRO. Further, we never advertised LRO historically before a02e8964eaf92 ("virtio-net: ethtool configurable LRO") and so bridged/forwarded configs effectively always relied on virtio receive offloads behaving like GRO - thus even if this breaks any configs it is at least not a regression. Fixes: a02e8964eaf92 ("virtio-net: ethtool configurable LRO") Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Reported-by: Ivan <ivan@prestigetransportation.com> Tested-by: Ivan <ivan@prestigetransportation.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> --- Changes from V1: - Tweak the commit log --- drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)