@@ -69,11 +69,6 @@ static struct snd_soc_dai_link storm_dai_link = {
.ops = &storm_soc_ops,
};
-static struct snd_soc_card storm_soc_card = {
- .name = "ipq806x-storm",
- .dev = NULL,
-};
-
static int storm_parse_of(struct snd_soc_card *card)
{
struct snd_soc_dai_link *dai_link = card->dai_link;
@@ -99,14 +94,13 @@ static int storm_parse_of(struct snd_soc_card *card)
static int storm_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
- struct snd_soc_card *card = &storm_soc_card;
+ struct snd_soc_card *card;
int ret;
- if (card->dev) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s() error, existing soundcard\n",
- __func__);
- return -ENODEV;
- }
+ card = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*card), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!card)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
card->dev = &pdev->dev;
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, card);
@@ -129,7 +123,6 @@ static int storm_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
ret = devm_snd_soc_register_card(&pdev->dev, card);
if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
- card->dev = NULL;
return ret;
} else if (ret) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s() error registering soundcard: %d\n",
This patch moves static allocation of snd_soc_card to dynamic allocation, the reason to do this is to avoid holding up any dangling pointers in this static structures. And I see no use for having this struct as static given that the card->name is also populated dynamically from dt. Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> --- sound/soc/qcom/storm.c | 17 +++++------------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)