@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ bool v4l2_find_dv_timings_cap(struct v4l2_dv_timings *t,
if (!v4l2_valid_dv_timings(t, cap, fnc, fnc_handle))
return false;
- for (i = 0; i < v4l2_dv_timings_presets[i].bt.width; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; v4l2_dv_timings_presets[i].bt.width; i++) {
if (v4l2_valid_dv_timings(v4l2_dv_timings_presets + i, cap,
fnc, fnc_handle) &&
v4l2_match_dv_timings(t, v4l2_dv_timings_presets + i,
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ bool v4l2_find_dv_timings_cea861_vic(struct v4l2_dv_timings *t, u8 vic)
{
unsigned int i;
- for (i = 0; i < v4l2_dv_timings_presets[i].bt.width; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; v4l2_dv_timings_presets[i].bt.width; i++) {
const struct v4l2_bt_timings *bt =
&v4l2_dv_timings_presets[i].bt;
These for-loops should test against v4l2_dv_timings_presets[i].bt.width, not if i < v4l2_dv_timings_presets[i].bt.width. Luckily nothing ever broke, since the smallest width is still a lot higher than the total number of presets, but it is wrong. The last item in the presets array is all 0, so the for-loop must stop when it reaches that sentinel. Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl> Reported-by: Krzysztof HaĆasa <khalasa@piap.pl> ---