diff mbox series

[v2,net] ipv6: tcp: drop silly ICMPv6 packet too big messages

Message ID 20210708065001.1150422-1-eric.dumazet@gmail.com
State New
Headers show
Series [v2,net] ipv6: tcp: drop silly ICMPv6 packet too big messages | expand

Commit Message

Eric Dumazet July 8, 2021, 6:50 a.m. UTC 
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>

While TCP stack scales reasonably well, there is still one part that
can be used to DDOS it.

IPv6 Packet too big messages have to lookup/insert a new route,
and if abused by attackers, can easily put hosts under high stress,
with many cpus contending on a spinlock while one is stuck in fib6_run_gc()

ip6_protocol_deliver_rcu()
 icmpv6_rcv()
  icmpv6_notify()
   tcp_v6_err()
    tcp_v6_mtu_reduced()
     inet6_csk_update_pmtu()
      ip6_rt_update_pmtu()
       __ip6_rt_update_pmtu()
        ip6_rt_cache_alloc()
         ip6_dst_alloc()
          dst_alloc()
           ip6_dst_gc()
            fib6_run_gc()
             spin_lock_bh() ...

Some of our servers have been hit by malicious ICMPv6 packets
trying to _increase_ the MTU/MSS of TCP flows.

We believe these ICMPv6 packets are a result of a bug in one ISP stack,
since they were blindly sent back for _every_ (small) packet sent to them.

These packets are for one TCP flow:
09:24:36.266491 IP6 Addr1 > Victim ICMP6, packet too big, mtu 1460, length 1240
09:24:36.266509 IP6 Addr1 > Victim ICMP6, packet too big, mtu 1460, length 1240
09:24:36.316688 IP6 Addr1 > Victim ICMP6, packet too big, mtu 1460, length 1240
09:24:36.316704 IP6 Addr1 > Victim ICMP6, packet too big, mtu 1460, length 1240
09:24:36.608151 IP6 Addr1 > Victim ICMP6, packet too big, mtu 1460, length 1240

TCP stack can filter some silly requests :

1) MTU below IPV6_MIN_MTU can be filtered early in tcp_v6_err()
2) tcp_v6_mtu_reduced() can drop requests trying to increase current MSS.

This tests happen before the IPv6 routing stack is entered, thus
removing the potential contention and route exhaustion.

Note that IPv6 stack was performing these checks, but too late
(ie : after the route has been added, and after the potential
garbage collect war)

Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@google.com>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
---
v2: fix typo caught by Martin, thanks !

 net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
index 593c32fe57ed13a218492fd6056f2593e601ec79..323989927a0a6a2274bcbc1cd0ac72e9d49b24ad 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
@@ -348,11 +348,20 @@  static int tcp_v6_connect(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr *uaddr,
 static void tcp_v6_mtu_reduced(struct sock *sk)
 {
 	struct dst_entry *dst;
+	u32 mtu;
 
 	if ((1 << sk->sk_state) & (TCPF_LISTEN | TCPF_CLOSE))
 		return;
 
-	dst = inet6_csk_update_pmtu(sk, READ_ONCE(tcp_sk(sk)->mtu_info));
+	mtu = READ_ONCE(tcp_sk(sk)->mtu_info);
+
+	/* Drop requests trying to increase our current mss.
+	 * Check done in __ip6_rt_update_pmtu() is too late.
+	 */
+	if (tcp_mtu_to_mss(sk, mtu) >= tcp_sk(sk)->mss_cache)
+		return;
+
+	dst = inet6_csk_update_pmtu(sk, mtu);
 	if (!dst)
 		return;
 
@@ -433,6 +442,8 @@  static int tcp_v6_err(struct sk_buff *skb, struct inet6_skb_parm *opt,
 	}
 
 	if (type == ICMPV6_PKT_TOOBIG) {
+		u32 mtu = ntohl(info);
+
 		/* We are not interested in TCP_LISTEN and open_requests
 		 * (SYN-ACKs send out by Linux are always <576bytes so
 		 * they should go through unfragmented).
@@ -443,7 +454,11 @@  static int tcp_v6_err(struct sk_buff *skb, struct inet6_skb_parm *opt,
 		if (!ip6_sk_accept_pmtu(sk))
 			goto out;
 
-		WRITE_ONCE(tp->mtu_info, ntohl(info));
+		if (mtu < IPV6_MIN_MTU)
+			goto out;
+
+		WRITE_ONCE(tp->mtu_info, mtu);
+
 		if (!sock_owned_by_user(sk))
 			tcp_v6_mtu_reduced(sk);
 		else if (!test_and_set_bit(TCP_MTU_REDUCED_DEFERRED,