Message ID | 20210612023502.1283837-2-memxor@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | Fixes for TC-BPF series | expand |
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c b/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c index d743c8721aa7..efbb50ad59d8 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c @@ -675,8 +675,6 @@ static int __bpf_tc_detach(const struct bpf_tc_hook *hook, return -EINVAL; if (priority > UINT16_MAX) return -EINVAL; - if (flags & ~BPF_TC_F_REPLACE) - return -EINVAL; if (!flush) { if (!handle || !priority) return -EINVAL;
Coverity complained about this being unreachable code. It is right because we already enforce flags to be unset, so a check validating the flag value is redundant. CID: 322808 Fixes: 715c5ce454a6 ("libbpf: Add low level TC-BPF management API") Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> --- tools/lib/bpf/netlink.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)