@@ -852,8 +852,10 @@ static struct pwm_chip *device_to_pwmchip(struct device *dev)
*
* This is analogous to of_pwm_get() except con_id is not yet supported.
* ACPI entries must look like
- * Package () {"pwms", Package ()
- * { <PWM device reference>, <PWM index>, <PWM period> [, <PWM flags>]}}
+ * Package () { "pwms", Package () {
+ * <PWM device reference>, <PWM index>, <PWM period>, <PWM flags>,
+ * }
+ * }
*
* Returns: A pointer to the requested PWM device or an ERR_PTR()-encoded
* error code on failure.
@@ -877,7 +879,7 @@ static struct pwm_device *acpi_pwm_get(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
if (!acpi)
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
- if (args.nargs < 2)
+ if (args.nargs < 3)
return ERR_PTR(-EPROTO);
chip = device_to_pwmchip(&acpi->dev);
@@ -891,7 +893,7 @@ static struct pwm_device *acpi_pwm_get(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
pwm->args.period = args.args[1];
pwm->args.polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
- if (args.nargs > 2 && args.args[2] & PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED)
+ if (args.args[2] & PWM_POLARITY_INVERTED)
pwm->args.polarity = PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED;
#endif
It makes little sense to make PWM flags optional since in case of multi-channel consumer the flags can be optional only for the last listed channel. Thus always require PWM flags to be provided. Fixes: 4a6ef8e37c4d ("pwm: Add support referencing PWMs from ACPI") Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/pwm/core.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)