Message ID | 20210524232214.1378937-10-olteanv@gmail.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | Add NXP SJA1110 support to the sja1105 DSA driver | expand |
On 5/24/2021 4:22 PM, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> > > There are 4 variations of the SJA1110 switch which have a different set > of MII protocols supported per port. Document the compatible strings. > > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Time to YAMLify that binding? -- Florian
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 07:24:36PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 5/24/2021 4:22 PM, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> > > > > There are 4 variations of the SJA1110 switch which have a different set > > of MII protocols supported per port. Document the compatible strings. > > > > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> > > Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> > > Time to YAMLify that binding? I'm afraid that will sidetrack in another discussion about sja1105,role-mac and sja1105,role-phy which I'm not prepared to have right now. Those boolean properties are to my knowledge unused, so I could remove them, but the phy-mode = "mii" + sja1105,role-phy would have to be replaced with phy-mode = "revmii" and similarly, a new phy-mode would have to be introduced for phy-mode = "revrmii" or something.
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/sja1105.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/sja1105.txt index 13fd21074d48..7029ae92daef 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/sja1105.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/sja1105.txt @@ -11,6 +11,10 @@ Required properties: - "nxp,sja1105q" - "nxp,sja1105r" - "nxp,sja1105s" + - "nxp,sja1110a" + - "nxp,sja1110b" + - "nxp,sja1110c" + - "nxp,sja1110d" Although the device ID could be detected at runtime, explicit bindings are required in order to be able to statically check their validity.