| Message ID | 1423642857-24240-2-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c index 2f9571b..f12cce6 100644 --- a/kernel/irq/chip.c +++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c @@ -561,8 +561,12 @@ handle_fasteoi_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc) raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock); return; out: - if (!(chip->flags & IRQCHIP_EOI_IF_HANDLED)) - eoi_irq(desc, chip); + if (!(chip->flags & IRQCHIP_EOI_IF_HANDLED)) { + if (chip->irq_priority_drop) + chip->irq_priority_drop(&desc->irq_data); + if (chip->irq_eoi) + chip->irq_eoi(&desc->irq_data); + } raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(handle_fasteoi_irq);
With current handle_fasteoi_irq implementation, in case irqd_irq_disabled is true (disable_irq was called) or !irq_may_run, the IRQ is not completed. Only the running priority is dropped. IN those cases, the IRQ will never be forwarded and hence will never be deactivated by anyone else. Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org> --- kernel/irq/chip.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)