diff mbox series

[-next] scsi: hisi_sas: drop free_irq of devm_request_irq allocated irq

Message ID 20210518130902.1307494-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com
State Superseded
Headers show
Series [-next] scsi: hisi_sas: drop free_irq of devm_request_irq allocated irq | expand

Commit Message

Yang Yingliang May 18, 2021, 1:09 p.m. UTC
irq allocated with devm_request_irq should not be freed using
free_irq, because doing so causes a dangling pointer, and a
subsequent double free.

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Comments

Yang Yingliang May 19, 2021, 3:36 a.m. UTC | #1
On 2021/5/18 23:34, John Garry wrote:
> On 18/05/2021 14:09, Yang Yingliang wrote:

>> irq allocated with devm_request_irq should not be freed using

>> free_irq, because doing so causes a dangling pointer, and a

>> subsequent double free.

>>

>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>

>> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>

>> ---

>>   drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c | 6 +++---

>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

>>

>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c 

>> b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c

>> index 499c770d405c..684f762bcfb3 100644

>> --- a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c

>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c

>> @@ -4811,9 +4811,9 @@ hisi_sas_v3_destroy_irqs(struct pci_dev *pdev, 

>> struct hisi_hba *hisi_hba)

>>   {

>>       int i;

>>   -    free_irq(pci_irq_vector(pdev, 1), hisi_hba);

>> -    free_irq(pci_irq_vector(pdev, 2), hisi_hba);

>> -    free_irq(pci_irq_vector(pdev, 11), hisi_hba);

>> +    devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, pci_irq_vector(pdev, 1), hisi_hba);

>> +    devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, pci_irq_vector(pdev, 2), hisi_hba);

>> +    devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, pci_irq_vector(pdev, 11), hisi_hba);

>>       for (i = 0; i < hisi_hba->cq_nvecs; i++) {

>>           struct hisi_sas_cq *cq = &hisi_hba->cq[i];

>>           int nr = hisi_sas_intr_conv ? 16 : 16 + i;

>>

>

> Does the free_irq(pci_irq_vector(pdev, nr, cq)) call also need to 

> change (not shown)?

Yes, I missed that, it should be changed too.
>

> Having said that, why have these at all if we use devm_request_irq()? 

> devm_irq_release() calls free_irq().

I keep the original logic here, only avoid double free.
>

> Thanks,

> John

>

> .
John Garry May 19, 2021, 11:19 a.m. UTC | #2
On 19/05/2021 04:36, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> 

> On 2021/5/18 23:34, John Garry wrote:

>> On 18/05/2021 14:09, Yang Yingliang wrote:

>>> irq allocated with devm_request_irq should not be freed using

>>> free_irq, because doing so causes a dangling pointer, and a

>>> subsequent double free.

>>>

>>> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>

>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>

>>> ---

>>>   drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c | 6 +++---

>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

>>>

>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c 

>>> b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c

>>> index 499c770d405c..684f762bcfb3 100644

>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c

>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c

>>> @@ -4811,9 +4811,9 @@ hisi_sas_v3_destroy_irqs(struct pci_dev *pdev, 

>>> struct hisi_hba *hisi_hba)

>>>   {

>>>       int i;

>>>   -    free_irq(pci_irq_vector(pdev, 1), hisi_hba);

>>> -    free_irq(pci_irq_vector(pdev, 2), hisi_hba);

>>> -    free_irq(pci_irq_vector(pdev, 11), hisi_hba);

>>> +    devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, pci_irq_vector(pdev, 1), hisi_hba);

>>> +    devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, pci_irq_vector(pdev, 2), hisi_hba);

>>> +    devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, pci_irq_vector(pdev, 11), hisi_hba);

>>>       for (i = 0; i < hisi_hba->cq_nvecs; i++) {

>>>           struct hisi_sas_cq *cq = &hisi_hba->cq[i];

>>>           int nr = hisi_sas_intr_conv ? 16 : 16 + i;

>>>

>>

>> Does the free_irq(pci_irq_vector(pdev, nr, cq)) call also need to 

>> change (not shown)?

> Yes, I missed that, it should be changed too.


So I think that we need this addition:
  devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, pci_irq_vector(pdev, nr), cq);

>>

>> Having said that, why have these at all if we use devm_request_irq()? 

>> devm_irq_release() calls free_irq().

> I keep the original logic here, only avoid double free.


Kasan doesn't complain. Anyway, I think we can't rely on device-managed 
method (for calling free_irq()) as it conflicts with pci free vectors 
call. I thought that someone was developed a device-managed version of 
that (pci_alloc_irq_vectors()).

Anyway, please proceed with your change, but with the suggested addition.

Thanks
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c
index 499c770d405c..684f762bcfb3 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_v3_hw.c
@@ -4811,9 +4811,9 @@  hisi_sas_v3_destroy_irqs(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct hisi_hba *hisi_hba)
 {
 	int i;
 
-	free_irq(pci_irq_vector(pdev, 1), hisi_hba);
-	free_irq(pci_irq_vector(pdev, 2), hisi_hba);
-	free_irq(pci_irq_vector(pdev, 11), hisi_hba);
+	devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, pci_irq_vector(pdev, 1), hisi_hba);
+	devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, pci_irq_vector(pdev, 2), hisi_hba);
+	devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, pci_irq_vector(pdev, 11), hisi_hba);
 	for (i = 0; i < hisi_hba->cq_nvecs; i++) {
 		struct hisi_sas_cq *cq = &hisi_hba->cq[i];
 		int nr = hisi_sas_intr_conv ? 16 : 16 + i;