Message ID | 20210419202257.161730-8-richard.henderson@linaro.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | target/arm: enforce alignment | expand |
On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at 21:36, Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote: > > Using cpu_abort takes care of things like unregistering a > SIGABRT handler for user-only. I would find this argument more persuasive if we didn't have a ton of other places where we call abort() or assert() or g_assert_not_reached(). Either we should have a consistent mechanism for assertions in linux-user turning off the SIGABRT handler, or we should just not worry about it on the basis that it's a "can't happen" error anyway... thanks -- PMM
diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c index 4aa7650d3a..8275eb2e65 100644 --- a/target/arm/helper.c +++ b/target/arm/helper.c @@ -13257,11 +13257,10 @@ static inline void assert_hflags_rebuild_correctly(CPUARMState *env) CPUARMTBFlags r = rebuild_hflags_internal(env); if (unlikely(c.flags != r.flags || c.flags2 != r.flags2)) { - fprintf(stderr, "TCG hflags mismatch " - "(current:(0x%08x,0x" TARGET_FMT_lx ")" - " rebuilt:(0x%08x,0x" TARGET_FMT_lx ")\n", - c.flags, c.flags2, r.flags, r.flags2); - abort(); + cpu_abort(env_cpu(env), "TCG hflags mismatch " + "(current:(0x%08x,0x" TARGET_FMT_lx ")" + " rebuilt:(0x%08x,0x" TARGET_FMT_lx ")\n", + c.flags, c.flags2, r.flags, r.flags2); } #endif }
Using cpu_abort takes care of things like unregistering a SIGABRT handler for user-only. Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> --- target/arm/helper.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) -- 2.25.1